ISDA published its response to the EC consultation on the draft technical screening criteria for climate change mitigation and adaptation under the proposed delegated act for the EU Taxonomy. In its response, ISDA recommends, among others, alignment between the technical screening criteria and the relevant provisions in the existing EU legislation, establishment of a comprehensive framework for activities contributing to climate change mitigation, a phase-in approach to activities, respecting the technological neutrality of the screening criteria, and incorporation of a grandfathering clause for certain data. The ISDA response endorses the general remarks of the European Federation of Energy Traders. EC is expected to adopt the final delegated act for EU Taxonomy in early 2021.
ISDA welcomes the opportunity to respond to EC consultation on technical screening criteria for climate change mitigation and adaptation. The following are the key highlights of the main recommendations of ISDA in response to the EC consultation:
- Ensuring alignment between the technical screening criteria laid out in the delegated act and the relevant provisions in the existing EU legislation. ISDA supports the alignment between a number of technical screening criteria laid out in the draft delegated acts and the relevant provisions in the existing EU acquis. ISDA urges EC to ensure that such alignment constitutes a common principle underpinning the Taxonomy Regulation (Article 19(1)(d)).
- Setting comprehensive framework for activities contributing to climate change mitigation. ISDA welcomes the EC commitment to ensuring that technical screening criteria consider whether the given economic activity makes a substantial contribution to climate change mitigation in accordance with the Taxonomy Regulation 2020/852. The delegated act should create a proportionate framework for both transitional and enabling activities, based on their respective contributions to climate change mitigation.
- Phase-in approach. For activities upgrading or altering existing assets or processes, the adaptation solutions identified need to be implemented within five years from the start of the activity. A similar phase-in approach should apply for the existing activities when the delegated act comes into application as well as for new activities established after the delegated act comes into application. The length of the phase-in should be proportionate to the type of activity.
- Respecting technological neutrality of screening criteria in line with Article 19(1)(a) of Taxonomy Regulation. The said article stipulates that the screening criteria must “identify the most relevant potential contributions to the given environmental objective while respecting the principle of technological neutrality, considering both the short and the long-term impact of the given economic activity.”
- Data grandfathering clause. A grandfathering clause should apply when data based on the time before the delegated act enter into force is compiled or transferred into the period for which taxonomy rules apply.
- Others. A “where feasible” or “where applicable” principle in application of the criteria is vital to implementing the criteria in practical terms and would benefit from further guidance (with industry input). Furthermore, to avoid any doubt, it should be clearly stated that third-country activities count if an Environmental Impact Assessment has been completed in accordance with equivalent national provisions or international standards.”
Keywords: International, Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Climate Change Risk, ESG, Technical Screening Criteria, Sustainable Finance, Taxonomy Regulation, Responses to Consultation, EC, ISDA
Previous ArticleBOT Enhances Support Measures for Debtors Amid Pandemic
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on draft regulatory technical standards for the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts of collective investment undertakings or CIUs, in line with the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published a report that summarizes banking conditions in the United States, along with the supervisory and regulatory activities of FED.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) recently completed two pilot initiatives in its 2020-2024 Cyber Security Strategy, which was published in November 2020.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published further information related to its 2021 assessment of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), with additional details to help understand the scoring methodology.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is consulting on an Accounting Standards Update and the associated taxonomy improvements for requirements on troubled debt restructurings and vintage disclosures under the credit losses standard (for financial instruments) topic 326.
US Agencies issued a statement that summarizes the work undertaken during the interagency policy sprints focused on crypto-assets and provides a roadmap of future work related to crypto-assets.