ISDA published its response to the EC consultation on the draft technical screening criteria for climate change mitigation and adaptation under the proposed delegated act for the EU Taxonomy. In its response, ISDA recommends, among others, alignment between the technical screening criteria and the relevant provisions in the existing EU legislation, establishment of a comprehensive framework for activities contributing to climate change mitigation, a phase-in approach to activities, respecting the technological neutrality of the screening criteria, and incorporation of a grandfathering clause for certain data. The ISDA response endorses the general remarks of the European Federation of Energy Traders. EC is expected to adopt the final delegated act for EU Taxonomy in early 2021.
ISDA welcomes the opportunity to respond to EC consultation on technical screening criteria for climate change mitigation and adaptation. The following are the key highlights of the main recommendations of ISDA in response to the EC consultation:
- Ensuring alignment between the technical screening criteria laid out in the delegated act and the relevant provisions in the existing EU legislation. ISDA supports the alignment between a number of technical screening criteria laid out in the draft delegated acts and the relevant provisions in the existing EU acquis. ISDA urges EC to ensure that such alignment constitutes a common principle underpinning the Taxonomy Regulation (Article 19(1)(d)).
- Setting comprehensive framework for activities contributing to climate change mitigation. ISDA welcomes the EC commitment to ensuring that technical screening criteria consider whether the given economic activity makes a substantial contribution to climate change mitigation in accordance with the Taxonomy Regulation 2020/852. The delegated act should create a proportionate framework for both transitional and enabling activities, based on their respective contributions to climate change mitigation.
- Phase-in approach. For activities upgrading or altering existing assets or processes, the adaptation solutions identified need to be implemented within five years from the start of the activity. A similar phase-in approach should apply for the existing activities when the delegated act comes into application as well as for new activities established after the delegated act comes into application. The length of the phase-in should be proportionate to the type of activity.
- Respecting technological neutrality of screening criteria in line with Article 19(1)(a) of Taxonomy Regulation. The said article stipulates that the screening criteria must “identify the most relevant potential contributions to the given environmental objective while respecting the principle of technological neutrality, considering both the short and the long-term impact of the given economic activity.”
- Data grandfathering clause. A grandfathering clause should apply when data based on the time before the delegated act enter into force is compiled or transferred into the period for which taxonomy rules apply.
- Others. A “where feasible” or “where applicable” principle in application of the criteria is vital to implementing the criteria in practical terms and would benefit from further guidance (with industry input). Furthermore, to avoid any doubt, it should be clearly stated that third-country activities count if an Environmental Impact Assessment has been completed in accordance with equivalent national provisions or international standards.”
Keywords: International, Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Climate Change Risk, ESG, Technical Screening Criteria, Sustainable Finance, Taxonomy Regulation, Responses to Consultation, EC, ISDA
Previous ArticleEBA Updates Basel III Impact Study Following EC Call for Advice
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.