ISDA published its response to the EC consultation on the draft technical screening criteria for climate change mitigation and adaptation under the proposed delegated act for the EU Taxonomy. In its response, ISDA recommends, among others, alignment between the technical screening criteria and the relevant provisions in the existing EU legislation, establishment of a comprehensive framework for activities contributing to climate change mitigation, a phase-in approach to activities, respecting the technological neutrality of the screening criteria, and incorporation of a grandfathering clause for certain data. The ISDA response endorses the general remarks of the European Federation of Energy Traders. EC is expected to adopt the final delegated act for EU Taxonomy in early 2021.
ISDA welcomes the opportunity to respond to EC consultation on technical screening criteria for climate change mitigation and adaptation. The following are the key highlights of the main recommendations of ISDA in response to the EC consultation:
- Ensuring alignment between the technical screening criteria laid out in the delegated act and the relevant provisions in the existing EU legislation. ISDA supports the alignment between a number of technical screening criteria laid out in the draft delegated acts and the relevant provisions in the existing EU acquis. ISDA urges EC to ensure that such alignment constitutes a common principle underpinning the Taxonomy Regulation (Article 19(1)(d)).
- Setting comprehensive framework for activities contributing to climate change mitigation. ISDA welcomes the EC commitment to ensuring that technical screening criteria consider whether the given economic activity makes a substantial contribution to climate change mitigation in accordance with the Taxonomy Regulation 2020/852. The delegated act should create a proportionate framework for both transitional and enabling activities, based on their respective contributions to climate change mitigation.
- Phase-in approach. For activities upgrading or altering existing assets or processes, the adaptation solutions identified need to be implemented within five years from the start of the activity. A similar phase-in approach should apply for the existing activities when the delegated act comes into application as well as for new activities established after the delegated act comes into application. The length of the phase-in should be proportionate to the type of activity.
- Respecting technological neutrality of screening criteria in line with Article 19(1)(a) of Taxonomy Regulation. The said article stipulates that the screening criteria must “identify the most relevant potential contributions to the given environmental objective while respecting the principle of technological neutrality, considering both the short and the long-term impact of the given economic activity.”
- Data grandfathering clause. A grandfathering clause should apply when data based on the time before the delegated act enter into force is compiled or transferred into the period for which taxonomy rules apply.
- Others. A “where feasible” or “where applicable” principle in application of the criteria is vital to implementing the criteria in practical terms and would benefit from further guidance (with industry input). Furthermore, to avoid any doubt, it should be clearly stated that third-country activities count if an Environmental Impact Assessment has been completed in accordance with equivalent national provisions or international standards.”
Keywords: International, Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Climate Change Risk, ESG, Technical Screening Criteria, Sustainable Finance, Taxonomy Regulation, Responses to Consultation, EC, ISDA
Previous ArticleBOT Enhances Support Measures for Debtors Amid Pandemic
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/763 that lays down implementing technical standards for supervisory reporting and public disclosure of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL).
EBA published a report that examines the convergence of prudential supervisory practices in 2020 and offers conclusions of the EBA college monitoring activity.
APRA announced the standardization of quarterly reporting due dates for authorized deposit-taking institutions.
The private sector working group of ECB on euro risk-free rates published the recommendations to address events that would trigger fallbacks in the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (EURIBOR)-related contracts, along with the €STR-based EURIBOR fallback rates (rates that could be used if a fallback is triggered).
Bundesbank published a list of "EntryPoints" that are accepted in its reporting system; the list provides taxonomy version and name of the module against each EntryPoint.
EBA published the phase 1 of its reporting framework 3.1, with the technical package covering the new reporting requirements for investment firms (under the implementing technical standards on investment firms reporting).
The Sustainable Finance Taskforce of IOSCO held two roundtables, with global stakeholders, on the IOSCO priorities to enhance the reliability, comparability, and consistency of sustainability-related disclosures and to collect views on the practical implementation of a global system architecture for these disclosures.
Asia Pacific Australia Banking APS 111 Capital Adequacy Regulatory Capital Basel RBNZ APRA
ESMA published the final guidelines on outsourcing to cloud service providers.
EBA published annual data for two key concepts and indicators in the Deposit Guarantee Schemes (DGS) Directive—available financial means and covered deposits.