ECB published a guide that sets out the supervisory approach to consolidation in the banking sector. The guide was finalized post a consultation process, which ended on October 01, 2020. ECB also published a feedback statement for the comments received on this guide. As part of the supervisory approach, ECB will use certain tools to facilitate sustainable consolidation projects. Such projects must be based on a credible business and integration plan, improve the sustainability of the business model, and respect high standards of governance and risk management. The guide addresses key issues such as Pillar 2 capital requirements of the combined entity, treatment of badwill (the difference between the re-evaluated book value of a bank and the price the acquirer pays), and permission for temporary use of the already approved internal models.
The guide covers the overall approach to the supervisory assessment of consolidation projects, the supervisory expectations regarding consolidation projects, the supervisory approach to key prudential aspects of the consolidation transaction, the ongoing supervision of the newly combined entity, and the application of this framework to consolidation transactions involving less significant institutions. Banks under resolution do not fall within the scope of the guide. The guide clarifies the following:
- ECB will not penalize credible integration plans by setting higher Pillar 2 capital requirements. Furthermore, during the application process, it will communicate to banks an indication of the capital levels the combined bank will need to maintain.
- Supervisors expect the profits stemming from badwill to play their role as capital of the combined bank. This means that banks are expected not to pay out, in dividends, profits stemming from badwill until the sustainability of the business model has been firmly established. ECB expects the acquirer to take advantage of a relatively low acquisition price to increase sustainability.
- ECB will accept temporary use of the existing internal models, subject to a strong roll-out plan.
The approach taken is founded on the baseline case whereby a bank subject to the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) intends to acquire the control of another bank subject to the SSM. These principles remain valid with the necessary adaptations in all other cases, even when a non-bank or non-SSM bank is involved. All cases involving the proposed acquisition of a bank subject to the SSM fall under the common procedures of ECB and the relevant national competent authorities. Past experience shows that there is no “one size fits all” approach when it comes to banking sector consolidation. Consequently, a case-by-case approach based on proportionality in the application of these principles should be expected. ECB encourages parties considering consolidation to engage with supervisors early on. This will allow ECB to give preliminary feedback on such projects.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Basel, Proportionality, SSM, Regulatory Capital, Internal Model, Pillar 2, Dividend Distribution, ECB
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.
ECB published results of the quarterly lending survey conducted on 143 banks in the euro area.
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.
EBA published the annual report on asset encumbrance of banks in EU.
MAS revised the guidelines that address technology and cyber risks of financial institutions, in an environment of growing use of cloud technologies, application programming interfaces, and rapid software development.
FED updated the reporting form and instructions for the FR Y-9C report on consolidated financial statements for holding companies.
EBA issued a consultation paper on the guidelines on monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects of the establishment of intermediate EU parent undertakings, or IPUs, as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive.
EC published Regulation 2021/25 that addresses amendments related to the financial reporting consequences of replacement of the existing interest rate benchmarks with alternative reference rates.
BIS published a bulletin, or a note, that examines the cyber threat landscape in the context of the pandemic and discusses policies to reduce risks to financial stability.
HM Treasury, also known as HMT, has updated the table containing the list of the equivalence decisions that came into effect in UK at the end of the transition period of its withdrawal from EU.