General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
January 11, 2018

ESMA published a thematic report on fees charged by credit rating agencies (CRAs) and trade repositories. This report follows the conclusion of the supervisory review of ESMA on the fee structures in the credit rating and trade repository industries. The thematic report identifies the areas for improvement regarding transparency and disclosure, the fee-setting process, and the interaction with entities related to CRAs and trade repositories. Going forward, these areas will form the core of the supervisory focus of ESMA.

The report contains views of ESMA on the application of the requirements that fees charged by CRAs should be non-discriminatory and cost-based and that trade repositories provide non-discriminatory access and charge publicly disclosed and cost-related fees. ESMA identified the following key concerns related to the fee provisions and improvements in the practices followed by CRAs and trade repositories:

  • Transparency and disclosure. CRAs and trade repositories need to ensure sufficiency and clarity of information provided to actual and potential clients as well as to ESMA. CRA clients should be able to understand the key elements of the fee schedule and reasons for deviations from it, in addition to the reasons of price increases/decreases. Trade repositories can achieve more transparency by reducing complexity and increasing comparability of fee schedules and by disclosing sufficient information, to enable clients to estimate additional reporting costs.
  • Fee-setting process. CRAs and trade repositories must ensure that cost is a key pricing factor and sufficient controls are in place to demonstrate that the regulatory objectives regarding pricing are met.
  • Interaction with entities related to CRAs and trade repositories. CRAs must ensure that provision of rating-related services by affiliated entities does not conflict with the non-discrimination and cost-based principles. Trade repositories that are part of a group need to ensure that intra-group transactions are on reasonable terms and on an "arms' length principle" to prevent discriminatory access and unfair cost allocation.

Related Link: Press Release

Keywords: Europe, Securities, CRA, Trade Repositories, Fee-Setting Process, Disclosures, ESMA

Related Articles

FASB Issues Minor Improvements to Financial Instruments Standards

FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update (ASU No. 2019-04) that clarifies and improves areas of guidance related to the recently issued standards on credit losses (Topic 326), derivatives and hedging (Topic 815), and recognition and measurement of financial instruments (Topic 825).

April 25, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

APRA Grants License to New Authorized Deposit-Taking Institution

APRA announced that it has granted Judo Bank Pty Ltd a license to operate as an authorized deposit-taking institution without restrictions, under the Banking Act 1959.

April 24, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

BoE Report on Evaluation of Approach to Concurrent Stress Testing

BoE published a report on the evaluation, by the Independent Evaluation Office (IEO), of the effectiveness of the approach of BoE to concurrent stress testing.

April 24, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

FDIC Consults on Approach to Resolution Planning for IDIs

FDIC approved an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) and is seeking comment on ways to tailor and improve its rule requiring certain insured depository institutions (IDIs) to submit resolution plans.

April 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

FDIC Specifies Submission Timeline for FFIEC 031, 041, and 051 Reports

FDIC published the financial institution letters (FIL-21-2019 and FIL-22-2019) that offer guidance on submission of Call Reports FFIEC 051, FFIEC 041, and FFIEC 031 for the first quarter of 2019.

April 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

US Agencies Propose to Revise Call Reports FFIEC 031, 041, and 051

US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) proposed to revise and extend, for three years, the Call Reports FFIEC 031, FFIEC 041, and FFIEC 051.

April 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

US Agencies Propose to Amend Rule on Supplementary Leverage Ratio

US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) are proposing to revise the capital requirements for supplementary leverage ratio, as required by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection (EGRRCP) Act.

April 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

EIOPA Held InsurTech Roundtable on Use of Cloud Computing by Insurers

EIOPA had, on April 11, 2019, hosted its Fourth InsurTech Roundtable on the use of cloud computing by insurance undertakings.

April 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

EP Resolution on Proposal for Sovereign Bond Backed Securities

The European Parliament (EP) published adopted text on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on sovereign bond-backed securities (SBBS).

April 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

HKMA Decides to Maintain Countercyclical Capital Buffer at 2.5%

HKMA announced that, in accordance with the Banking (Capital) Rules, the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) ratio for Hong Kong remains at 2.5%.

April 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2957