PRA published the consultation paper CP1/19 that is proposing changes to the supervisory statement (SS17/13) on credit risk mitigation. The proposed changes clarify expectations about the eligibility of financial collateral as funded credit protection under Part Three, Title II, Chapter 4 (Credit risk mitigation) of the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013). This consultation closes on April 10, 2019.
The criteria for recognizing collateral as eligible for credit risk mitigation (CRM) purposes are set out in CRR Part Three, Title II, Chapter 4 (Credit risk mitigation). Where the collateral is financial collateral, these criteria include that "the credit quality of the obligor and the value of the collateral shall not have a material positive correlation" (CRR Article 207(2)). In relation to non-recourse loans, in some cases a significant fall in the value of the financial collateral can bring about the default of the obligor. As such, the creditworthiness of the obligor can depend materially on the value of the financial collateral. The risk mitigation provided by such collateral may be compromised and Article 207(2) is relevant. In view of PRA, CRR is clear on this point. However, PRA has identified some variability in how firms interpret and apply the Article 207(2) requirement. PRA considers it necessary to clarify both how Article 207(2) applies in such circumstances and PRA’s expectations of how firms should treat collateral with a material positive correlation for credit risk mitigation purposes.
The consultation proposes adding a new chapter to SS17/13, set out in the Appendix. CP1/19 is relevant to UK banks, building societies, and PRA-designated UK investment firms that are subject to CRR. In February 2018, CP6/18 titled "Credit risk mitigation: Eligibility of guarantees as unfunded credit protection" had proposed adding a Chapter 7 to SS17/13; therefore, CP1/19 proposes to add Chapter 8, subject to the outcome of CP6/18.
Comment Due Date: April 10, 2018
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Credit Risk Mitigation, Credit Risk, CRR, CP1/19, SS17/13, PRA
Previous ArticleBCL Publishes Dates for Monthly and Quarterly AnaCredit Reporting
Next ArticleFASB Issues Q&A on Estimating Credit Loss Reserves
BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community.
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting