Randal Quarles of FED Speaks About Upcoming Capital Rules for Insurers
While speaking at the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI) Executive Roundtable in Florida, Randal K. Quarles of FED provided some updates on the forthcoming proposal on insurance holding company capital requirements, often referred to as the Building Block Approach. He also discussed the importance of insurance sector to the economy and the role of FED in the consolidated supervision of insurance firms.
After stating that Dodd-Frank Act gave FED regulatory responsibilities for insurance holding companies that choose to own a federally insured depository institution and those designated by FSOC, Mr. Quarles moved on to discuss the advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) on insurance capital requirements, which FED had issued in June 2016. The ANPR had set out two frameworks for capital standards that are each unlike the capital rules for bank holding companies: a "consolidated approach" applicable to systemically important insurance companies and a "Building Block Approach" to be applied to savings and loan holding companies or bank holding companies with significant insurance activities. The Building Block Approach, as set out in the ANPR, was fashioned as a framework that builds on the regulatory capital rules of subsidiaries' functional regulators—state or foreign insurance regulators for insurance subsidiaries and federal banking regulators for insured depository institutions—to provide a consolidated capital requirement. He mentioned that FED appreciates the comments received, including from the ACLI and other interested parties, and has worked hard to reflect the perspectives of commenters in developing the framework. FED expects to publish a formal proposal in the "not-too-distant future."
He then explained that, for various reasons, in designing the Building Block Approach, FED had decided against applying the bank holding company capital rules to supervised insurance firms, the "capital approach akin to the European Solvency II framework," and the Insurance Capital Standard (ICS) by IAIS. He added that for any form of an ICS to be implementable globally, it needs to be suitable for the U.S. insurance market. The current core proposal in the ICS would face implementation challenges in the United States. For instance, such a framework may fail to adequately account for the U.S. accounting frameworks, both Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and the NAIC's Statutory Accounting Principles, can introduce excessive volatility, and may involve excessive reliance on the internal models of supervised firms. This motivates FED's advocacy of an aggregation alternative and the use of an alternative valuation method that derives from U.S. GAAP in the ICS.
The proposed Building Block Approach is an approach to a consolidated capital requirement that considers all material risks in the enterprise by aggregating the capital positions of companies under an insurance holding company, after making some adjustments and scaling them to a common capital regime. These building blocks are then used to calculate combined, enterprise-level capital resources and requirements. In each building block, the Building Block Approach generally applies the capital regime for that block to the subsidiaries in that block. For instance, in a life insurance building block, subsidiaries within this block would be treated in the Building Block Approach the way they would be treated under life insurance capital requirements. The Building Block Approach would apply insurance capital rules consistently, without regard to permitted accounting practices granted by an individual state, thus uniformly applying statutory accounting principles as set forth by NAIC. Measures to avoid double-counting, including double-leverage, that could arise from intercompany transactions would be built into the approach's aggregation process.
Other areas where adjustments would be made include provisions to comply with the Collins Amendment of the Dodd-Frank Act—for instance, allowing only instruments meeting the criteria under the FED's bank capital rules to qualify as capital for an insurance holding company—and technical adjustments. Two building blocks under two different capital regimes cannot simply be added together if, as is frequently the case, each regime has a different scale for its ratios and thresholds. The Building Block Approach proposes to scale and equate capital positions in different regimes through analyzing historical defaults under those regimes. In conclusion, Mr. Quarles reinforced that FED remains committed to discharging its domestic authority responsibly in a way that recognizes the unique business of insurance companies. Additionally, FED will continue to advocate for international insurance standards that promote a global level playing field and work well for the U.S. insurance market.
Related Link: Speech
Keywords: Americas, US, Insurance, Accounting, Building Block Approach, Capital Requirements, Dodd Frank Act, US GAAP, FED
Previous Article
OCC Publishes Final Rule Revising the Stress Testing RegulationRelated Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.