ESMA published its advice to the EU Institutions (European Commission, Council, and Parliament) on initial coin offerings and crypto-assets. The advice clarifies the existing EU rules applicable to crypto-assets that qualify as financial instruments and outlines the position of ESMA on any gaps and issues in the current EU financial regulatory framework for consideration by EU policymakers.
The gaps and issues fall into two categories:
- For crypto-assets that qualify as financial instruments under MiFID, there are areas that require potential interpretation or re-consideration of specific requirements to allow for an effective application of the existing regulations
- Where these assets do not qualify as financial instruments, the absence of applicable financial rules leaves investors exposed to substantial risksESMA believes that Anti Money Laundering (AML) requirements should apply to all crypto-assets and activities involving crypto-assets. There should also be appropriate risk disclosure in place to make consumers aware of the potential risks prior to committing funds to crypto-assets.
ESMA opines that crypto-assets raise specific challenges for regulators and market participants, as there may be a lack of clarity about how the regulatory framework applies to such instruments. Where it does apply, there may be areas where crypto-assets require potential interpretation or re-consideration of specific requirements to allow an effective application of regulations. Where regulation does not apply to crypto-assets and related activities, regulators need to consider whether it should, and if so how. ESMA considers it important to take a technology-neutral approach, to ensure that similar activities and assets are subject to the same or very similar standards regardless of their form.
ESMA has been working with national competent authorities on analyzing the different business models of crypto-assets, the risks and potential benefits that they may introduce, and how they fit within the existing regulatory framework. ESMA’s work on crypto-assets has highlighted a number of issues that are beyond the remit of ESMA. The advice allows the EU Institutions to consider possible ways in which the noted gaps and issues may be addressed and subjected to further analysis. ESMA will continue to actively monitor market developments in the area of crypto-assets while cooperating with national competent authorities and global regulators.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Crypto-assets, Regtech, Fintech, Distributed Ledger Technology, ESMA
Previous ArticleFED Updates Reporting and Supplemental Instructions for Form FR Y-9C
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.