ESAs published a joint report providing a comparative analysis of the innovation facilitators (that is, regulatory sandboxes and innovation hubs) established to date within the EU. ESAs also set out best practices for the design and operation of the innovation facilitators. Annex A to the report contains a list of regulatory sandboxes and innovation hubs in EU and Annex B to the report describes principles for establishment and operation of innovation facilitators.
The number of innovation facilitators in the EU has grown rapidly in recent years. As of the date of the report, 21 EU member states and three European Economic Area states have established innovation hubs while five EU member states have regulatory sandboxes in operation. A comparative analysis of these national innovation facilitators is set out in the report and, based on this analysis, a set of best practices has been prepared. The best practices are intended to promote consistency across the single market in the design and operation of innovation facilitators; promote transparency of regulatory and supervisory policy outcomes from arising from interactions in the context of innovation facilitators; and facilitate cooperation between national authorities, including consumer and data protection authorities. ESAs also set out options, to be considered in the context of future EU-level work on innovation facilitators, to promote coordination and cooperation between innovation facilitators, which would support the scaling-up of FinTech across the single market. These options comprise the development of Joint ESA own-initiative guidance on cooperation and coordination between innovation facilitators, along with the creation of an EU network to bridge innovation facilitators established at the member state level.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Fintech, Regtech, Regulatory Sandbox, Innovation Hub, ESAs
Previous ArticleFCA to be the UK Regulator of Credit Rating Agencies
CBUAE has issued a regulation that introduces the licensing and supervision framework for low-risk, specialized banks.
APRA is consulting on CPG 511—the draft Prudential Practice Guide on remuneration for banks, insurers, and superannuation licensees—with the comment period ending on July 23, 2021.
MAS announced a new RegTech grant scheme and an enhancement of the Digital Acceleration Grant (DAG) scheme to accelerate technology adoption in the financial sector.
PRA published a letter that sets out findings from the 2020 Internal Audit Review of the Collections function of a sample of non-systemic banks and building societies.
EIOPA launched a consultation on the Interbank Offered Rate (IBOR) transitions, in context of the EU Benchmarks Regulation.
EIOPA published a discussion paper on uses cases of, and the European approach to, blockchain and smart contracts in the insurance sector.
HKMA granted a banking license to NongHyup Bank (also NH Bank), which is incorporated in the Republic of Korea.
PRA published a discussion paper that explores options for developing a simpler but resilient prudential framework for banks and building societies that are neither systemically important nor internationally active.
ECB published an opinion on the proposal for a regulation on the pilot regime for market infrastructures based on distributed ledger technology.
EBA proposed regulatory technical standards that specify how to identify the appropriate risk-weights and conditions when assessing minimum loss given default (LGD) values for exposures secured by immovable property.