ESAs published a joint report providing a comparative analysis of the innovation facilitators (that is, regulatory sandboxes and innovation hubs) established to date within the EU. ESAs also set out best practices for the design and operation of the innovation facilitators. Annex A to the report contains a list of regulatory sandboxes and innovation hubs in EU and Annex B to the report describes principles for establishment and operation of innovation facilitators.
The number of innovation facilitators in the EU has grown rapidly in recent years. As of the date of the report, 21 EU member states and three European Economic Area states have established innovation hubs while five EU member states have regulatory sandboxes in operation. A comparative analysis of these national innovation facilitators is set out in the report and, based on this analysis, a set of best practices has been prepared. The best practices are intended to promote consistency across the single market in the design and operation of innovation facilitators; promote transparency of regulatory and supervisory policy outcomes from arising from interactions in the context of innovation facilitators; and facilitate cooperation between national authorities, including consumer and data protection authorities. ESAs also set out options, to be considered in the context of future EU-level work on innovation facilitators, to promote coordination and cooperation between innovation facilitators, which would support the scaling-up of FinTech across the single market. These options comprise the development of Joint ESA own-initiative guidance on cooperation and coordination between innovation facilitators, along with the creation of an EU network to bridge innovation facilitators established at the member state level.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Fintech, Regtech, Regulatory Sandbox, Innovation Hub, ESAs
Previous ArticleFCA to be the UK Regulator of Credit Rating Agencies
APRA has concluded its review of the comprehensive plans of authorized deposit-taking institutions for the assessment and management of loans with repayment deferrals.
ESAs (EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA) published the first joint report that assesses risks in the financial sector since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
BoE and HM Treasury confirmed that the COVID Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF) will close for new purchases of commercial paper, with effect from March 23, 2021.
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
EC adopted a decision determining, for a limited period of time, that the regulatory framework applicable to central counterparties, or CCPs, in the UK and Northern Ireland is equivalent to the requirements laid down in the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR or Regulation 648/2012).
EBA has decided to phase out the guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria of loan repayments, in accordance with the earlier specified end of September deadline.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.