Brian P. Brooks, the Acting Comptroller of the Currency at OCC, issued a statement endorsing the need for federal charters for fintech companies. The statement was issued on the release of a report from the CFPB taskforce. Mr. Brooks agreed with the conclusion of the report that the nation needs federal charters for fintech companies to effectively, efficiently, and safely serve the financial needs of consumers under a single uniform set of rules. The report also highlights the need for legal certainty about which agency (OCC or CFPB) is authorized to grant charters to fintech companies.
In the statement, Mr. Brooks mentioned that, under the law, OCC grants national charters to companies engaged in lending, payments, or deposit-taking. In its wisdom, Congress, in the Dodd-Frank Act, separated chartering and prudential supervision from consumer protection enforcement, assigning chartering authority to OCC and specific consumer protection enforcement authority to CFPB. According to the report, the Taskforce recommends that Congress either authorize CFPB to issue federal charters or licenses to non-bank fintech companies engaged in payments, remittances, or lending services, or clarify the authority of OCC. By making CFPB the licensing agency, Congress would assure that consumer protection concerns are at the forefront. The report highlights that OCC, which has a long history of evaluating and granting charters, recently took steps to issue charters to such companies engaged in lending and has announced its intent to do the same with money transmitters. These efforts are subject to legal uncertainty because of questions about whether a non-depository institution can engage in “banking” under the National Bank Act.
If Congress elects not to authorize CFPB to issue federal licenses, it should clarify that OCC has that authority. This alternative option would ensure that fintech companies operating nationwide are subject to a single set of laws. Moreover, it is noted that OCC has significant expertise in fintech in general and in these services specifically; thus, OCC may be well-positioned to supervise non-bank fintech companies with multistate operations. Regardless of which agency charters the fintech companies, the agency exercising that authority should pay careful attention to any capital requirements and other unnecessary or excessive regulatory burdens.
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Fintech, Fintech Charters, Regulatory Capital, CFPB, OCC
FDIC is seeking comments on a rule to amend the interagency guidelines for real estate lending policies—also known as the Real Estate Lending Standards.
ISDA is consulting on the implementation of fallbacks for the sterling LIBOR ICE Swap Rate and for the USD LIBOR ICE Swap Rate.
BIS and BoE launched the BIS Innovation Hub Center in London, which is the fourth new Innovation Hub Centre to be opened in the past two years.
ESRB published recommendations on the reciprocation of macro-prudential measures in Belgium, France, Luxembourg, Norway, and Sweden.
SEC announced that the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs released the Spring 2021 Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions.
EC published the Delegated Regulation 2021/931, which supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or Regulation 575/2013) with regard to the regulatory technical standards specifying the method for identifying derivative transactions with one or more than one material risk driver.
BCBS is consulting on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures of banks.
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules under the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
BIS Innovation Hub, BDF, and SNB announced that, together with a private-sector consortium led by Accenture, they will conduct an experiment using wholesale central bank digital currency (wCBDC) for cross-border settlement.
ESAs published two amended implementing technical standards on the mapping of credit assessments of External Credit Assessment Institutions (ECAIs).