MAS announced successful conclusion of the first phase of the Veritas initiative, which saw the development of the fairness assessment methodology in credit risk scoring and customer marketing. These are the first two use cases to help financial institutions validate the fairness of their Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics (AIDA) solutions according to the Fairness, Ethics, Accountability, and Transparency (FEAT) principles. The Veritas Consortium, comprising MAS and industry partners, also published a report on the fairness assessment methodology and the open source code of these two use cases. These documents detail a five-part methodology to assess the application of the FEAT fairness principles in the two use cases. The methodology addresses the implementation challenges in the responsible use of AIDA and provides an actionable approach for financial institutions to validate their AIDA solutions.
Veritas, which is a part of National AI Strategy of Singapore, aims to provide financial institutions with a verifiable way to incorporate the FEAT principles into their AIDA solutions. The report expands on the risk-based approach, which the methodology takes, to FEAT fairness assessment. It includes background on the current market practice for AIDA risk management in financial services institutions, guidance for developing scoping and scaling processes to apply the methodology to systems with different risk levels, and guidance on integrating fairness assessment into existing risk management practices. The report defines key terms in the principles, then moves to present the five-part methodology, which includes describing system objectives and context, examining data and models for unintended bias, measuring disadvantage, justifying the use of personal attributes, and examining system monitoring and review.
To help assess the fairness risks of consequential AIDA systems, the report presents a comprehensive 18-question assessment. Questions in the five parts of the methodology are designed to help financial services institutions make their objectives for fairness explicit and provide evidence that the system’s operation is aligned with those objectives. Each part of the methodology also contains a set of considerations to assist AIDA System Owners, Developers, and Assessors in performing and reviewing an assessment. Finally, a series of appendices provide additional technical reference material to complement the methodology (Appendix 1); advice on mitigation strategies and actions to improve AIDA system fairness (Appendix 2); resources for software implementations, fairness measurement, and mitigation (Appendix 3); and references for further reading (Appendix 4).
Accompanying this report are a set of “FEAT Fairness Assessment Case Studies” (Document 2). The document on case studies presents complete and detailed case studies of applying the methodology to hypothetical but realistic systems: one for customer marketing and another for credit scoring. It also provides reflections from two financial services institutions (HSBC for customer marketing and United Overseas Bank Limited for credit scoring) that applied the methodology to their real systems as well as series of use-case specific considerations to assist financial services institutions in completing assessments of customer marketing and credit scoring systems. This development marks a milestone for the Veritas initiative and paves the way for the next phase of work. Phase Two will look into developing the Ethics, Accountability, and Transparency assessment methodology for the two use cases in Phase One. Phase Two will also include use cases for the insurance industry. MAS has also released a list of Phase Two Veritas Consortium members.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Veritas, Fintech, Artificial Intelligence, Data Analytics, Veritas Consortium, FEAT Principles, MAS
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.