MAS announced successful conclusion of the first phase of the Veritas initiative, which saw the development of the fairness assessment methodology in credit risk scoring and customer marketing. These are the first two use cases to help financial institutions validate the fairness of their Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics (AIDA) solutions according to the Fairness, Ethics, Accountability, and Transparency (FEAT) principles. The Veritas Consortium, comprising MAS and industry partners, also published a report on the fairness assessment methodology and the open source code of these two use cases. These documents detail a five-part methodology to assess the application of the FEAT fairness principles in the two use cases. The methodology addresses the implementation challenges in the responsible use of AIDA and provides an actionable approach for financial institutions to validate their AIDA solutions.
Veritas, which is a part of National AI Strategy of Singapore, aims to provide financial institutions with a verifiable way to incorporate the FEAT principles into their AIDA solutions. The report expands on the risk-based approach, which the methodology takes, to FEAT fairness assessment. It includes background on the current market practice for AIDA risk management in financial services institutions, guidance for developing scoping and scaling processes to apply the methodology to systems with different risk levels, and guidance on integrating fairness assessment into existing risk management practices. The report defines key terms in the principles, then moves to present the five-part methodology, which includes describing system objectives and context, examining data and models for unintended bias, measuring disadvantage, justifying the use of personal attributes, and examining system monitoring and review.
To help assess the fairness risks of consequential AIDA systems, the report presents a comprehensive 18-question assessment. Questions in the five parts of the methodology are designed to help financial services institutions make their objectives for fairness explicit and provide evidence that the system’s operation is aligned with those objectives. Each part of the methodology also contains a set of considerations to assist AIDA System Owners, Developers, and Assessors in performing and reviewing an assessment. Finally, a series of appendices provide additional technical reference material to complement the methodology (Appendix 1); advice on mitigation strategies and actions to improve AIDA system fairness (Appendix 2); resources for software implementations, fairness measurement, and mitigation (Appendix 3); and references for further reading (Appendix 4).
Accompanying this report are a set of “FEAT Fairness Assessment Case Studies” (Document 2). The document on case studies presents complete and detailed case studies of applying the methodology to hypothetical but realistic systems: one for customer marketing and another for credit scoring. It also provides reflections from two financial services institutions (HSBC for customer marketing and United Overseas Bank Limited for credit scoring) that applied the methodology to their real systems as well as series of use-case specific considerations to assist financial services institutions in completing assessments of customer marketing and credit scoring systems. This development marks a milestone for the Veritas initiative and paves the way for the next phase of work. Phase Two will look into developing the Ethics, Accountability, and Transparency assessment methodology for the two use cases in Phase One. Phase Two will also include use cases for the insurance industry. MAS has also released a list of Phase Two Veritas Consortium members.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Veritas, Fintech, Artificial Intelligence, Data Analytics, Veritas Consortium, FEAT Principles, MAS
Previous ArticleMAS Sets Out Timeline for SIBOR Transition
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.