MAS announced successful conclusion of the first phase of the Veritas initiative, which saw the development of the fairness assessment methodology in credit risk scoring and customer marketing. These are the first two use cases to help financial institutions validate the fairness of their Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics (AIDA) solutions according to the Fairness, Ethics, Accountability, and Transparency (FEAT) principles. The Veritas Consortium, comprising MAS and industry partners, also published a report on the fairness assessment methodology and the open source code of these two use cases. These documents detail a five-part methodology to assess the application of the FEAT fairness principles in the two use cases. The methodology addresses the implementation challenges in the responsible use of AIDA and provides an actionable approach for financial institutions to validate their AIDA solutions.
Veritas, which is a part of National AI Strategy of Singapore, aims to provide financial institutions with a verifiable way to incorporate the FEAT principles into their AIDA solutions. The report expands on the risk-based approach, which the methodology takes, to FEAT fairness assessment. It includes background on the current market practice for AIDA risk management in financial services institutions, guidance for developing scoping and scaling processes to apply the methodology to systems with different risk levels, and guidance on integrating fairness assessment into existing risk management practices. The report defines key terms in the principles, then moves to present the five-part methodology, which includes describing system objectives and context, examining data and models for unintended bias, measuring disadvantage, justifying the use of personal attributes, and examining system monitoring and review.
To help assess the fairness risks of consequential AIDA systems, the report presents a comprehensive 18-question assessment. Questions in the five parts of the methodology are designed to help financial services institutions make their objectives for fairness explicit and provide evidence that the system’s operation is aligned with those objectives. Each part of the methodology also contains a set of considerations to assist AIDA System Owners, Developers, and Assessors in performing and reviewing an assessment. Finally, a series of appendices provide additional technical reference material to complement the methodology (Appendix 1); advice on mitigation strategies and actions to improve AIDA system fairness (Appendix 2); resources for software implementations, fairness measurement, and mitigation (Appendix 3); and references for further reading (Appendix 4).
Accompanying this report are a set of “FEAT Fairness Assessment Case Studies” (Document 2). The document on case studies presents complete and detailed case studies of applying the methodology to hypothetical but realistic systems: one for customer marketing and another for credit scoring. It also provides reflections from two financial services institutions (HSBC for customer marketing and United Overseas Bank Limited for credit scoring) that applied the methodology to their real systems as well as series of use-case specific considerations to assist financial services institutions in completing assessments of customer marketing and credit scoring systems. This development marks a milestone for the Veritas initiative and paves the way for the next phase of work. Phase Two will look into developing the Ethics, Accountability, and Transparency assessment methodology for the two use cases in Phase One. Phase Two will also include use cases for the insurance industry. MAS has also released a list of Phase Two Veritas Consortium members.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Veritas, Fintech, Artificial Intelligence, Data Analytics, Veritas Consortium, FEAT Principles, MAS
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the criteria to identify shadow banking entities for the purposes of reporting large exposures.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/786 with regard to the liquidity coverage requirements for credit institutions under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published the strategic plan for 2022-2025 and the departmental plan for 2022-23.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is consulting, until August 31, 2022, on the draft implementing technical standards specifying requirements for the information that sellers of non-performing loans (NPLs) shall provide to prospective buyers.
The European Council and the Parliament reached an agreement on the revised Directive on security of network and information systems (NIS2 Directive).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying information that crowdfunding service providers shall provide to investors on the calculation of credit scores and prices of crowdfunding offers.
The European Council published a draft Commission Delegated Regulation to amend the regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published a paper that examines the systemic risk posed by increasing use of cloud services, along with the potential policy options to mitigate this risk.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) published amendments to Notice 635, which sets out requirements that a bank in Singapore has to comply with when granting an unsecured non-card credit facility to individuals.
The European Commission (EC) published a public consultation on the review of revised payment services directive (PSD2) and open finance.