FSB published the conclusions of FSB on governance arrangements for the Unique Transaction Identifier (UTI), along with a recommended implementation plan for these arrangements. The final arrangements take account of stakeholder responses to a public consultation launched in March 2017, as well as an industry workshop.
The conclusions and implementation plan of FSB for UTI governance arrangements complement the work of CPMI and IOSCO, as they develop global guidance on harmonization of data elements that are reported to trade repositories. On February 28, 2017 CPMI and IOSCO had issued technical guidance on UTI harmonization, which sets out the UTI Data Standard, which contains a structural definition and a format specification. The UTI technical guidance also addresses associated matters such as the circumstances in which a UTI should be used, who should be responsible for generating a UTI, and the impact of life-cycle events on the UTI. The FSB report sets out conclusions on the governance arrangements for UTI, including the following:
A recommendation that jurisdictions implement the UTI no later than end-2020
The designation of the ISO as the responsible body for publishing and maintaining the UTI data standard
The designation of CPMI and IOSCO as the appropriate bodies to undertake the governance functions allocated to an International Governance Body related to the UTI on an interim basis
The UTI is a key global harmonized identifier for reporting over-the-counter (OTC) derivative transactions, in particular designed to facilitate effective aggregation of transaction reports. The primary purpose of the UTI is to uniquely identify individual OTC derivatives transactions in reports to trade repositories. In particular, a UTI helps to ensure the consistent aggregation of OTC derivatives transactions by minimising the likelihood that the same transaction will be counted more than once (for instance, because it is reported by more than one counterparty to a transaction, or to more than one trade repository).
Keywords: International, Securities, UTI Governance, FSB
Previous ArticleEC Vice President on Sustainable Finance and Capital Markets Union
BCBS Finalizes Revisions to Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework
PRA published a statement to insurers that clarifies the approach to application of the matching adjustment during COVID-19 crisis.
EBA published a report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies within the prudential framework for banking sector.
EC launched a consultation to revise the network and information systems (NIS) Directive (2016/1148), which was adopted in July 2016 and is the first horizontal internal market instrument aimed at improving the resilience of the EU against cybersecurity risks.
PRA published a statement that outlines its view on the implications of LIBOR transition for contracts in scope of the “Contractual Recognition of Bail-In” and “Stay in Resolution” parts of the PRA Rulebook.
PRA published the policy statement PS15/20 to reflect additional resilience associated with higher macro-prudential buffers in a standard risk environment with a reduction in Pillar 2A capital requirements.
BCBS published the eighteenth progress report on implementation of the Basel III regulatory framework in member jurisdictions.
FCA announced proposals that would provide continued support for certain consumer credit products to users, who are facing a financial impact because of the exceptional circumstances arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR published a draft version of taxonomy RAN 1.4.0_PWD1, along with the related documentation, for Solvency II reporting.
BCBS amended the guidelines on sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism (ML/FT).