General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
February 28, 2018

Ignazio Angeloni, Member of the ECB Supervisory Board, suggested taking another look at proportionality in banking supervision, at the Thirteenth Asia-Pacific High Level Meeting on Banking Supervision in Singapore. During his speech, he examined how proportionality principle is translated into legal and regulatory framework; what does European Banking Supervision do to conform to that principle; and what are the challenges one faces and the limits one must respect in applying proportionality in supervision.

He outlined the work and guidelines in this area, both at the international (by BCBS and BIS) and the EU level (via Capital Requirements Regulation and Directive—CRR and CRD IV). He also discussed the areas of Single Supervisory mechanism (SSM) where proportionality applies. These areas relate to significant banks, for whom reporting requirements and fees already differ; less significant banks, for whom the scope and frequency of information requests for reporting requirements depends on the nature of the entity concerned; and the less significant banks that are prioritized into High, Medium, and Low priority entities. Next, he mentioned some initiatives under discussion at the international and European levels to enhance proportionality in banking supervision. Within BCBS, simpler approaches for calculating capital requirements (for example, credit risk, operational risk, credit valuation adjustment risk) have been developed. At the EU level, in the ongoing review of the CRR and CRD IV, EC has proposed simplified market and counterparty credit risk measures for smaller institutions as well as reductions in the frequency and scope of supervisory data reporting and disclosure.

Mr. Angeloni stated: "ECB does not support lowering the reporting frequency for such entities. Frequent reporting is a key source of information for supervisors, especially in relation to smaller institutions, which do not undergo sufficient market scrutiny. Early warning systems are effective only if data are sufficiently frequent. Another challenge stems from setting the thresholds to categorize institutions, because quantitative thresholds are difficult to apply and at the margin may create cliff effects and distortions." He then discussed the challenges and limits of proportionality in banking supervision. Although smaller banks transmit little or no risk to the system, this does not imply that they are individually less risky. He added that, in both US and EU, the number of bank failures has been much higher in less significant than in significant banks, both in absolute terms and in relative terms. Thus, he argued that prudential soundness must remain the overarching principle, regardless of size. Additionally, small banks promote diversification in the banking system; hence, reducing concentration and correlation, if they act independently from each other. However, especially in Europe small institutions are often part of larger groups or associations (such as institutional protection schemes), which reduces the benefit from diversification. The tendency to aggregate in groups or protection schemes clearly confirms the existence of powerful economies of scale and scope.

Finally, he discussed the potential social role of small banks. Small and cooperative banks are still widely recognized as having a social role by granting access to finance, or the provision of other social benefits, particularly in certain areas and for specific population groups. In Europe especially, savings and cooperative banks maintain a strong historical and cultural rooting. However, most of the cooperative sector has moved away from its original social and charitable function and, today, performs standard banking business, providing services indistinguishable from those of its competitors. There may be cases justifying a support to smaller banks that provide financial services where other banks are less present, but there seems to be no compelling reason why such support should be embedded in the prudential framework, added Mr. Angeloni. He concluded that proportionality should not lead to supervisory laxity or deviations from the single rule book. "Arguments and evidence do not support, on balance, a more favorable treatment to small banks by the micro-prudential regulator or supervisor. If deemed justified, for example for social reasons, such support should be provided otherwise. In SSM, prudential soundness, harmonization, and competitive level-playing field have been and should remain the overarching guiding principles," according to Mr. Angeloni.

Related Link: Speech

Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Banking Supervision, Proportionality, SSM, Basel III, ECB

Related Insights

BCBS Finds Liquidity Risk Management Principles Remain Fit for Purpose

BCBS completed a review of its 2008 Principles for sound liquidity risk management and supervision. The review confirmed that the principles remain fit for purpose.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

MAS Guidelines on Risk Mitigation Requirements for OTC Derivatives

MAS published guidelines on risk mitigation requirements for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives contracts.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

HKMA Urges Local Banks to Start Working on FRTB Implementation

HKMA announced that it plans to issue a consultation paper on the new market risk standard in the second quarter of 2019.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA Finalizes Guidelines for High-Risk Exposures Under CRR

EBA published the final guidelines on the specification of types of exposures to be associated with high risk under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). The guidelines are intended to facilitate a higher degree of comparability in terms of the current practices in identifying high-risk exposures.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

BoE Publishes the Schedule for Statistical Reporting for 2019

BoE published the updated schedule for statistical reporting for 2019. The reporting institutions use the online statistical data application (OSCA) to submit statistical data to BoE.

January 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

PRA Delays Final Direction on Reporting of Private Securitizations

PRA and FCA have delayed the issuance of final direction, including the final template, on reporting of private securitizations, from January 15, 2019 to the end of January 2019.

January 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

SNB Updates Forms on Supervisory Reporting for Banks

SNB published Version 1.7 of reporting forms (AUR_U, AUR_UEA, AUR_UES, AURH_U, AUR_K, AUR_KEA, and AURH_K) and the related documentation for supervisory reporting on an individual and consolidated basis.

January 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

BCBS Finalizes Market Risk Capital Framework and Work Program for 2019

BCBS published the final framework for market risk capital requirements and its work program for 2019. Also published was an explanatory note to provide a non-technical description of the overall market risk framework, the changes that have been incorporated into in this version of the framework and impact of the framework.

January 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: First Update for January 2019

EBA published answers to 13 questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

January 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

PRA Proposes to Amend Supervisory Statement on Credit Risk Mitigation

PRA published the consultation paper CP1/19 that is proposing changes to the supervisory statement (SS17/13) on credit risk mitigation.

January 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2473