FED Finalizes Guidance on Board Effectiveness at Large Banks
FED finalized the guidance on effectiveness of the Board of Directors and released the results of its review of 27 Supervision and Regulation and Consumer Affairs letters (SR Letters) that contain guidance on the roles and responsibilities for Boards of Directors of holding companies. Post review, FED decided to revise twelve SR Letters, make inactive nine SR Letters, and retain six SR letters without change. The supervisory guidance on Board effectiveness applies to all domestic bank holding companies and domestic savings and loan holding companies with consolidated assets of USD 100 billion or more. The guidance also applies to systemically important nonbank financial companies designated by the Financial Stability Oversight Council for supervision by FED.
The supervisory guidance on the effectiveness of Board of Directors adopts a principles-based approach to describe attributes of effective boards and provides illustrative examples of effective practices. The guidance notes that an effective board:
- oversees the development of strategy and reviews, approves, and periodically monitors the firm's strategy and risk appetite.
- directs senior management to provide directors with information that is sufficient in scope, detail, and analysis to enable the board to make sound, well-informed decisions and consider potential risks.
- oversees and holds senior management accountable for effectively implementing the firm's strategy, consistent with its risk appetite, while maintaining an effective risk management framework and system of internal controls.
- assesses and supports—through its risk and audit committees—the stature and independence of the firm's independent risk management and internal audit functions.
- considers whether the Board composition, governance structure, and practices support the firm's safety and soundness and promote compliance with laws and regulations (based on factors such as the firm's asset size, complexity, scope of operations, risk profile, and other changes that occur over time).
Firms subject to the large financial institution rating system are assigned three component ratings: Capital Planning and Positions, Liquidity Risk Management and Positions, and Governance and Controls. The supervisory assessment of Board effectiveness is one of the elements within the Governance and Controls component rating. As the board effectiveness guidance builds on the principles set forth in the large financial institution ratings framework, FED intends to use the board effectiveness guidance in informing its assessment of the governance and controls at all firms subject to the large financial institution rating system.
Related Links
- Notification on Guidance
- Guidance (PDF)
- Review of Supervisory Expectations
- Changes to Supervisory Letters (PDF)
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Governance, Large Banks, Guidance, Operational Risk, FED
Previous Article
EU Rule Amends Requirement for European Single Electronic FormatRelated Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
