EU Committee Recommends Systemic Risk Buffer of 4.5% in Norway
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway. Before making this recommendation, the Committee has carefully considered the evidence provided by the Norwegian Ministry of Finance, including the results of stress tests performed by the Norwegian authorities and the historical data on past severe crises in Norway. Thus, the Standing Committee of the EFTA States does not recommend any changes to the notified measure of the Norwegian Ministry in view of its effects on subsidiaries of credit institutions established in other European Economic Area states. Currently, credit institutions in Norway are subject to a systemic risk buffer of 3% on all exposures, except for two systemically important institutions that are subject to a systemic risk buffer of 5% on all exposures.
The notified systemic risk buffer of 4.5% would apply from December 31, 2020 to all credit institutions, except credit institutions that do not use the advanced internal ratings-based approach, as they would have a transitional period where the current buffer remains 3% on all exposures until December 31, 2022. The measure will apply to domestic exposures of credit institutions authorized in Norway, including five subsidiaries of parents established in other EU member states. The measure will be re-evaluated by the Ministry of Finance every second year. The Committee states that the notified systemic risk buffer is justified, suitable, proportionate, and effective to address the systemic risks for which it is intended. In its recommendation, the Committee also notes that other macro-prudential measures in the Capital Requirements Directive or Regulation, alone or in combination, would be relatively less effective in sufficiently and adequately addressing the identified risk.
Additionally, to reduce the potential for leakages to foreign institutions that are active in Norway through branches, the Ministry plans to request reciprocation of the systemic risk buffer for all European Economic Area institutions with exposures to Norway. The recommendation sets out that the notified measure, including its application to subsidiaries whose parents are established in other European Economic Area states, does not entail disproportionate adverse effects on the financial system of Norway or of the European Economic Area as a whole and does not constitute an obstacle to the proper functioning of the internal market. However, the Standing Committee notes that the reciprocation request and the higher capital requirements this would imply for foreign credit institutions will be assessed by ESRB when the Ministry will request the ESRB to recommend to its members to reciprocate the measure.
Related Link: Recommendation
Keywords: Europe, EU, Norway, Banking, Systemic Risk Buffer, CRD, CRR, Basel, Systemic Risk, Regulatory Capital, IRB Approach, EU Standing Committee
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Trevor Howes
IFRS 17 technical advisor; AXIS actuarial modeling system expert; extensive experience in life insurance and life reinsurance, with focus on modeling, valuation, and financial reporting
Related Articles
PRA Finalizes Supervisory Approach for Non-Systemic Banks in UK
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA Finalizes Standards on Methods of Prudential Consolidation
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA Updates List of Other Systemically Important Institutions in EU
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS Report Concludes Basel Risk Categories Can Capture Climate Risks
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities Welcome FSB Review of their Remuneration Regime
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA Letter on Addressing Risks from Use of Deposit Aggregators
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA to Amend Banking Act and Rules in Coming Months to Transpose CRD5
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC Delegated Regulation on Specialized Lending Exposures Under CRR
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI Proposes to Enhance Assurance Expectations for Basel Returns
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB Issues Results of Benchmarking Analysis of Recovery Plans of Banks
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.
