IMF published a working paper on credit cycle and capital buffers in Central America, Panama, and the Dominican Republic (CAPDR). The paper reviews the financial and credit developments in CAPDR countries, provides a comparative assessment of the credit cycle in the region, and discusses the possible use of countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) in the region as a tool to enhance the resilience of the banking system.
The paper describes the current state of financial developments in the region, highlighting that banks are well-capitalized, with good credit quality and a solid deposit base. Banking systems in CAPDR have capital ratios comfortably above the minimum requirements while NPLs are low—ranging from about 1% of total loans in Nicaragua to about 2.5% in Honduras and Guatemala—and typically over-provisioned. Credit is mostly financed by costumer deposits, which account, on an average, for 80% of total (non-interbank) loans. The paper then presents the methodology used to estimate the credit-to-GDP gap, starting from the approach proposed by BCBS, which is adjusted to account for the fast credit growth environment of developing economies. Next, the paper presents the empirical analysis that estimates the credit gap, tests its ability to signal impeding financial distress for each country in the region, and discusses implications for setting CCyB and capital adequacy requirements. In the paper, the authors estimate the credit cycle in CAPDR and find that the credit gap is a powerful predictor of systemic vulnerability in the region. They also simulate the activation of the Basel III CCyB and discuss the macro-prudential policy implications of the results, arguing that countercyclical macro-prudential policies based on the credit gap could prove useful to enhance the resilience of the region’s financial sector.
However, the authors conclude that activation of macro-prudential instruments should be informed by the development of other macro-financial variables and by expert judgment. It is recommended that formalizing an analytical framework to assess the applicability of CCyB in CAPDR should be considered to enhance the stability of the banking system. The signaling power of the credit gap suggests that authorities could consider introducing CCyB in their policy toolkit. CCyB would be a useful policy instrument to strengthen the resilience of the banking system through the financial cycle and limit the procyclicality of lending. Decisions on the CCyB should be based on a deep assessment of the credit developments. Qualitative information and judgment should also be used to analyze the changes in lending standards and credit conditions. Ultimately, the policy makers need to ensure that any expansion in credit is healthy and understand the reasons behind any credit contraction. Credit deepening must go hand-in-hand with measures that facilitate a healthy credit expansion such as effective legal frameworks for the creation, mobilization, and realization of collateral and effective insolvency proceedings.
Related Link: Working Paper
Keywords: Americas, Banking, Credit Cycle, Basel III, CCyB, Macro-Prudential Policy, Capital Adequacy, Systemic Risk, CAPDR, IMF
Previous ArticleEBA Publishes Handbook on Valuation for Bank Resolution
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
PRA published updates in relation to the 2021 Supervisory Benchmarking Portfolio exercise.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M; OMB No. 7100-0341).
HKMA revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CR-G-14 on margin and other risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions.
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.