IAIS published a statement from its Secretary General Jonathan Dixon on the Insurance Capital Standard (ICS) monitoring period. The statement informs about the IAIS expectations regarding participation in the monitoring period, the ultimate goal of a single global capital standard for Internationally Active Insurance Groups (IAIGs), and the refinement process of the ICS during the monitoring period. The draft definition of comparable outcomes and high-level principles will be subject to a public consultation later this year, as will the draft comparability criteria in 2021.
IAIS is developing the ICS as the global standard to be used as a prescribed capital requirement for Internationally Active Insurance Groups (IAIGs), based on a common set of principles. US members have indicated that their supervisory framework does not support a group-wide consolidated approach to a prescribed capital requirement. Therefore, the US and other interested jurisdictions are developing an Aggregation Method that follows a different approach than the ICS; they aim to use this approach for their implementation of the ICS on an outcome-equivalent basis. The Aggregation Method is not part of the ICS Version 2.0, nor is it being developed by IAIS as an alternate global standard.
The assessment of whether the Aggregation Method provides comparable outcomes to the ICS will be a technical assessment undertaken by IAIS. As a first step, IAIS has published a draft definition of comparable outcomes and considerations that will guide the development of high-level principles and criteria for the comparability assessment. IAIS has made it clear that this will be a robust and credible technical assessment that does not provide the Aggregation Method a free pass, while providing a viable path for the Aggregation Method to be deemed an outcome equivalent approach. This draft definition of comparable outcomes and high-level principles will be subject to a public consultation later this year, as will the draft comparability criteria in 2021.
The aim is to monitor the performance of the ICS over a period of time, rather than the capital adequacy of IAIGs. Active participation of IAIGs in the monitoring period is important for providing effective feedback on the ICS. IAIS does not have the legal power to directly mandate IAIGs to report the ICS results during the monitoring period. However, IAIS member supervisors collectively agreed to make participation as large as possible across different jurisdictions and business models, to ensure that the ICS captures risk appropriately. In addition to the feedback from supervisors, the IAIS will consider feedback from stakeholder engagement, a public consultation, and the results of an economic impact assessment, all of which could result in changes to the ICS Version 2.0. In the coming months, IAIS will collectively review the level of IAIG participation and discuss appropriate actions as necessary.
Keywords: International, Americas, US, Insurance, ICS, ICS Version 2, IAIG, Aggregation Method, Capital Adequacy, IAIS
Previous ArticleBoE Updates Version 1.1.0 of Taxonomy for Form AS and Form FV
HKMA has published a circular that sets out the regulatory and reporting treatment for loans that participating authorized institutions may grant to eligible borrowers under the 100% Personal Loan Guarantee Scheme.
ECB published the results of the assessment of internal models that banks use to calculate risk-weighted assets for credit, market, and counterparty credit risks.
PRA published a statement on the regulatory treatment of retail residential mortgage loans under the Mortgage Guarantee Scheme, or MGS.
FCA is consulting, via CP21/7, on the second phase of proposed rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR).
HM Treasury and BoE announced the joint creation of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) Taskforce to coordinate the exploration of a potential central bank digital currency in UK.
EIOPA published an opinion to set out its expectations on the supervision of the integration of climate change risk scenarios by insurers in their Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA).
Bundesbank published two circulars on AnaCredit reporting requirements. Circular 27/2021 covers changes to the reporting of branches, additional attributes to be reported for investment funds from August 01, 2021, and updates to the list of international organizations.
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/622 that lays down implementing technical standards for reporting of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL).
BCBS has set out the strategic work priorities, as part of its the work program for 2021-22.
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.