IAIS published a statement from its Secretary General Jonathan Dixon on the Insurance Capital Standard (ICS) monitoring period. The statement informs about the IAIS expectations regarding participation in the monitoring period, the ultimate goal of a single global capital standard for Internationally Active Insurance Groups (IAIGs), and the refinement process of the ICS during the monitoring period. The draft definition of comparable outcomes and high-level principles will be subject to a public consultation later this year, as will the draft comparability criteria in 2021.
IAIS is developing the ICS as the global standard to be used as a prescribed capital requirement for Internationally Active Insurance Groups (IAIGs), based on a common set of principles. US members have indicated that their supervisory framework does not support a group-wide consolidated approach to a prescribed capital requirement. Therefore, the US and other interested jurisdictions are developing an Aggregation Method that follows a different approach than the ICS; they aim to use this approach for their implementation of the ICS on an outcome-equivalent basis. The Aggregation Method is not part of the ICS Version 2.0, nor is it being developed by IAIS as an alternate global standard.
The assessment of whether the Aggregation Method provides comparable outcomes to the ICS will be a technical assessment undertaken by IAIS. As a first step, IAIS has published a draft definition of comparable outcomes and considerations that will guide the development of high-level principles and criteria for the comparability assessment. IAIS has made it clear that this will be a robust and credible technical assessment that does not provide the Aggregation Method a free pass, while providing a viable path for the Aggregation Method to be deemed an outcome equivalent approach. This draft definition of comparable outcomes and high-level principles will be subject to a public consultation later this year, as will the draft comparability criteria in 2021.
The aim is to monitor the performance of the ICS over a period of time, rather than the capital adequacy of IAIGs. Active participation of IAIGs in the monitoring period is important for providing effective feedback on the ICS. IAIS does not have the legal power to directly mandate IAIGs to report the ICS results during the monitoring period. However, IAIS member supervisors collectively agreed to make participation as large as possible across different jurisdictions and business models, to ensure that the ICS captures risk appropriately. In addition to the feedback from supervisors, the IAIS will consider feedback from stakeholder engagement, a public consultation, and the results of an economic impact assessment, all of which could result in changes to the ICS Version 2.0. In the coming months, IAIS will collectively review the level of IAIG participation and discuss appropriate actions as necessary.
Keywords: International, Americas, US, Insurance, ICS, ICS Version 2, IAIG, Aggregation Method, Capital Adequacy, IAIS
Previous ArticleBoE Updates Version 1.1.0 of Taxonomy for Form AS and Form FV
The European Commission (EC) published a public consultation on the review of revised payment services directive (PSD2) and open finance.
The European Commission (EC) has issued two letters mandating the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) to jointly propose amendments to the regulatory technical standards under Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation or SFDR.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on convergence of supervisory practices for 2021. Additionally, following a request from the European Commission (EC),
The Farm Credit Administration published, in the Federal Register, the final rule on implementation of the Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) methodology for allowances
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) looks set to intensify focus on crypto-assets and cyber risk and extended the comment period on the proposed rules to enhance and standardize climate-related disclosures for investors.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced reduction in the aggregate Committed Liquidity Facility and issued an update on the operational preparedness for zero and negative market interest rates.
The Commission for the Financial Market (CMF) in Chile published capital adequacy ratios (as of February 2022, January 2022, and December 2021) for 17 banks and for the banking system.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on the European Banking Authority (EBA) guidelines on management of non-performing exposures (NPEs) and forborne exposures.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) updated the implementing technical standards that specify the data collection for the 2023 supervisory benchmarking exercise in relation to the internal approaches used in market risk, credit risk, and IFRS 9 accounting.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a feedback statement on the responses received to the consultation on blockchain and smart contracts in insurance.