EIOPA Publishes Statement on Adverse Interest Rate Environment
EIOPA published a supervisory statement on the impact of the ultra-low or negative interest rate environment on the insurance sector in EU. The statement starts by analyzing the impact of ultra-low or negative yields on the European insurance sector, provides an overview of the supervisory responses and the reactions of undertakings to such an environment, and provides a set of recommendations to mitigate the impact of the ultra-low or negative interest rate environment. This statement should be read along with the background note of EIOPA, which focuses on the supervisory powers and measures and the reactions of companies to the low interest rate environment.
The statement highlights that the ultra-low or negative interest rate environment constitutes one of the most important sources of systemic risk for insurers for the coming years. Such an environment has an impact on both asset and liability sides of the balance sheet, affecting the solvency position and profitability of undertakings. The aim of the supervisory statement is to raise awareness and ensure that the insurance sector continues to be financially resilient. The statement also seeks to inform consumers and policyholders about supervisory measures and actions being taken to protect their interest. EIOPA encourages the national supervisory authorities and the undertakings in EU to continue taking actions to mitigate the impact of the ultra-low or negative interest rate environment on the EU insurance sector.
EIOPA recommends that, in the medium-to-long-term, the national supervisory authorities should identify whether there are any tools or powers missing in their current toolkit. Where a gap is identified, the national authorities should request the missing powers. In the short-term, however, EIOPA recommends that:
- National supervisory authorities should intensify the monitoring and supervision of insurers identified as facing greater exposure to the low interest rate environment;
- National supervisory authorities should engage in dialog with undertakings to explore actions they could take to improve their financial resilience
- Within the context of improving financial resilience and in particular sound capital planning, undertakings should exercise caution in distributing dividends and national supervisory authorities should consider whether it is necessary to restrict the distribution of dividends;
- National supervisory authorities and undertakings should pay special attention on preemptive recovery and resolution planning to reduce the likelihood and impact of insurance failures
- National supervisory authorities should broaden the analysis of the low interest rate environment and also consider the potential build-up of systemic risk.
The content of this document is aligned and should be read in conjunction with the policy proposals contained in the Consultation Paper on the Opinion on the 2020 Review of Solvency II.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Interest Rate Risk, Systemic Risk, Solvency II, Recovery and Resolution Planning, Asset and Liability Management, ALM, EIOPA
Featured Experts
Adam Koursaris
Asset and liability management expert; capable modeler; risk and capital specialist
Karen Moss
Senior practitioner in asset and liability management (ALM) and liquidity risk who assists banking clients in advancing their treasury and balance sheet management objectives
Yashan Wang
Leads a team that develops analytic and empirical models for impairment under GAAP, CECL, IFRS 9, and SAP for credit portfolio analysis and asset-liability management
Related Articles
EBA Updates List of Validation Rules for Reporting by Banks
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA Responds to EC Call for Advice to Strengthen AML/CFT Framework
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS Advocates Environmental Risk Analysis for Financial Sector
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.
MAS Issues Guidelines to Promote Senior Management Accountability
MAS published the guidelines on individual accountability and conduct at financial institutions.
APRA Formalizes Capital Treatment and Reporting of COVID-19 Loans
APRA published final versions of the prudential standard APS 220 on credit quality and the reporting standard ARS 923.2 on repayment deferrals.
SRB Chair Discusses Path to Harmonized Liquidation Regime for Banks
SRB published two articles, with one article discussing the framework in place to safeguard financial stability amid crisis and the other article outlining the path to a harmonized and predictable liquidation regime.
FSB Workshop Discusses Preliminary Findings of Too-Big-To-Fail Reforms
FSB hosted a virtual workshop as part of the consultation process for its evaluation of the too-big-to-fail reforms.
ECB Updates List of Supervised Entities in EU in September 2020
ECB updated the list of supervised entities in EU, with the number of significant supervised entities being 115.
OSFI Identifies Focus Areas to Strengthen Third-Party Risk Management
OSFI published the key findings of a study on third-party risk management.
FSB Extends Implementation Timeline for Framework on SFTs
FSB is extending the implementation timeline, by one year, for the minimum haircut standards for non-centrally cleared securities financing transactions or SFTs.
