EIOPA Publishes Statement on Adverse Interest Rate Environment
EIOPA published a supervisory statement on the impact of the ultra-low or negative interest rate environment on the insurance sector in EU. The statement starts by analyzing the impact of ultra-low or negative yields on the European insurance sector, provides an overview of the supervisory responses and the reactions of undertakings to such an environment, and provides a set of recommendations to mitigate the impact of the ultra-low or negative interest rate environment. This statement should be read along with the background note of EIOPA, which focuses on the supervisory powers and measures and the reactions of companies to the low interest rate environment.
The statement highlights that the ultra-low or negative interest rate environment constitutes one of the most important sources of systemic risk for insurers for the coming years. Such an environment has an impact on both asset and liability sides of the balance sheet, affecting the solvency position and profitability of undertakings. The aim of the supervisory statement is to raise awareness and ensure that the insurance sector continues to be financially resilient. The statement also seeks to inform consumers and policyholders about supervisory measures and actions being taken to protect their interest. EIOPA encourages the national supervisory authorities and the undertakings in EU to continue taking actions to mitigate the impact of the ultra-low or negative interest rate environment on the EU insurance sector.
EIOPA recommends that, in the medium-to-long-term, the national supervisory authorities should identify whether there are any tools or powers missing in their current toolkit. Where a gap is identified, the national authorities should request the missing powers. In the short-term, however, EIOPA recommends that:
- National supervisory authorities should intensify the monitoring and supervision of insurers identified as facing greater exposure to the low interest rate environment;
- National supervisory authorities should engage in dialog with undertakings to explore actions they could take to improve their financial resilience
- Within the context of improving financial resilience and in particular sound capital planning, undertakings should exercise caution in distributing dividends and national supervisory authorities should consider whether it is necessary to restrict the distribution of dividends;
- National supervisory authorities and undertakings should pay special attention on preemptive recovery and resolution planning to reduce the likelihood and impact of insurance failures
- National supervisory authorities should broaden the analysis of the low interest rate environment and also consider the potential build-up of systemic risk.
The content of this document is aligned and should be read in conjunction with the policy proposals contained in the Consultation Paper on the Opinion on the 2020 Review of Solvency II.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Interest Rate Risk, Systemic Risk, Solvency II, Recovery and Resolution Planning, Asset and Liability Management, ALM, EIOPA
Featured Experts
Adam Koursaris
Asset and liability management expert; capable modeler; risk and capital specialist
Karen Moss
Senior practitioner in asset and liability management (ALM) and liquidity risk who assists banking clients in advancing their treasury and balance sheet management objectives
Yashan Wang
Leads a team that develops analytic and empirical models for impairment under GAAP, CECL, IFRS 9, and SAP for credit portfolio analysis and asset-liability management
Related Articles
EU Amends CRD4 and CRD5 as Part of Capital Markets Recovery Package
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
EU Committee Recommends Systemic Risk Buffer of 4.5% in Norway
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
PRA Clarifies Approach to Onshoring of Credit Risk Rules for UK Banks
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
FSB Sets Out Work Priorities for 2021
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
EU Publishes Corrigendum to Revised Capital Requirements Regulation
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
ESAs Issue Statement on Application of Sustainability Disclosures Rule
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC Consults on Crisis Management and Deposit Insurance Frameworks
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA Enhances Loan Guarantee Scheme to Alleviate Pressure on SMEs
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA Proposes Standards for Supervisory Cooperation Under IFD
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE Addresses Banks in Scope of First Resolvability Assessment
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.
