ESMA published the first trends, risks, and vulnerabilities (TRV) report of 2020. In addition to the level of risks in EU, the report also takes an in-depth look at three specific issues via articles on the implications of bigtech for the financial sector, the short-termism pressures from financial markets, and the risk exposure of EU funds to potential bond downgrades. As per the report, risks in markets under the remit of ESMA remained high, particularly in securities markets and for consumers.
The report shows that market risk remained very high in the second half of 2019, amid continued geopolitical uncertainties, including Brexit and US-China trade relations. Credit risk and liquidity risk also remained high. Credit risk, in particular, remains elevated with deteriorating corporate debt quality and increasing risks of fallen angels (bonds being downgraded to below BBB) as the share of BBB-rated debt grows. The report also discusses structural market developments in the areas of securities markets, market-based finance, sustainable finance and financial innovation, with focus on the implications and challenges associated with the entry of bigtech firms into the financial sector.
This article on the implications of bigtech for the financial sector looks at the increasing presence of bigtech firms that take advantage of their vast customer networks, data analytics, and brand recognition. However, the growth of bigtech financial services varies by region, reflecting differences in the existing financial services provision and regulatory frameworks. The high level of market concentration typically observed in bigtech may get carried into financial services, with potentially adverse impacts on consumer prices and financial stability. The analysis considers the impact these firms could have and concludes that regulatory cooperation is needed to manage the financial stability risks that could arise as bigtech firms increase market concentration. Although bigtech firms typically devote huge resources in the form of advanced technology and specialist expertise to cyber-security, this feature could make them an attractive target for cyber-attacks and increase the detriment to individuals in the event of a data breach.
The report highlights that regulators and supervisors are well-positioned to gain insights about business propositions from initiatives such as innovation facilitators (including regulatory sandboxes). Development of innovative suptech tools may provide further information about market developments, helping authorities to mitigate potential risks and set appropriate supervisory expectations. To this end, ESMA continues to facilitate and coordinate sharing of information on financial innovation among its national competent authorities. Innovation facilitators across the financial sector are a valuable source of market intelligence. The importance of sharing such information among authorities at the EU level is reflected in the recent establishment of the European Forum for Innovation Facilitators (EFIF) by EC and ESAs. There may be value in continuing to deepen cooperation at national, European, and international levels among financial sector regulators and supervisors and other authorities, such as those responsible for data protection.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, TRV, Credit Risk, Liquidity Risk, Sustainable Finance, Market-Based Finance, Bigtech, Suptech, Cyber Risk, ESMA
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.