ESMA published the first trends, risks, and vulnerabilities (TRV) report of 2020. In addition to the level of risks in EU, the report also takes an in-depth look at three specific issues via articles on the implications of bigtech for the financial sector, the short-termism pressures from financial markets, and the risk exposure of EU funds to potential bond downgrades. As per the report, risks in markets under the remit of ESMA remained high, particularly in securities markets and for consumers.
The report shows that market risk remained very high in the second half of 2019, amid continued geopolitical uncertainties, including Brexit and US-China trade relations. Credit risk and liquidity risk also remained high. Credit risk, in particular, remains elevated with deteriorating corporate debt quality and increasing risks of fallen angels (bonds being downgraded to below BBB) as the share of BBB-rated debt grows. The report also discusses structural market developments in the areas of securities markets, market-based finance, sustainable finance and financial innovation, with focus on the implications and challenges associated with the entry of bigtech firms into the financial sector.
This article on the implications of bigtech for the financial sector looks at the increasing presence of bigtech firms that take advantage of their vast customer networks, data analytics, and brand recognition. However, the growth of bigtech financial services varies by region, reflecting differences in the existing financial services provision and regulatory frameworks. The high level of market concentration typically observed in bigtech may get carried into financial services, with potentially adverse impacts on consumer prices and financial stability. The analysis considers the impact these firms could have and concludes that regulatory cooperation is needed to manage the financial stability risks that could arise as bigtech firms increase market concentration. Although bigtech firms typically devote huge resources in the form of advanced technology and specialist expertise to cyber-security, this feature could make them an attractive target for cyber-attacks and increase the detriment to individuals in the event of a data breach.
The report highlights that regulators and supervisors are well-positioned to gain insights about business propositions from initiatives such as innovation facilitators (including regulatory sandboxes). Development of innovative suptech tools may provide further information about market developments, helping authorities to mitigate potential risks and set appropriate supervisory expectations. To this end, ESMA continues to facilitate and coordinate sharing of information on financial innovation among its national competent authorities. Innovation facilitators across the financial sector are a valuable source of market intelligence. The importance of sharing such information among authorities at the EU level is reflected in the recent establishment of the European Forum for Innovation Facilitators (EFIF) by EC and ESAs. There may be value in continuing to deepen cooperation at national, European, and international levels among financial sector regulators and supervisors and other authorities, such as those responsible for data protection.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, TRV, Credit Risk, Liquidity Risk, Sustainable Finance, Market-Based Finance, Bigtech, Suptech, Cyber Risk, ESMA
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.