ECB published a working paper on simulating fire sales in a system of banks and asset managers. The authors developed an agent-based model of traditional banks and asset managers to investigate the contagion risk related to fire sales and balance-sheet interactions. In the paper, the authors explain the underlying theoretical model, the behavior of banks and asset managers, the equilibrium in the interbank lending market, the creation of the network of banks, the simulation of shocks, their propagation, and the dynamics of the system. The findings show that banks active in both the interbank and securities markets may channel financial distress between the two markets.
The key findings highlighted in the paper include the following:
- Requirements have an ample effect on the contagion spreading following a funding shock. Tighter liquidity regulation immunizes the system from liquidity shocks, but higher capital requirements make it more profitable to invest into less-liquid assets financed by interbank borrowing.
- The speed of contagion depends on which sector the initial shock hits first. Contagion instigated by an asset manager’s funding problem initially develops slowly but, as time evolves, it can have a higher impact than that for the initial shock affected a bank. Monitoring of the asset management sector activities is crucial to assess fire-sale risk.
- Fire sales are fueled by imbalances between demand and supply for securities. This is a clear externality of the fire sales that can be mitigated by the central banks providing liquidity to the system.
- Asset managers absorb small liquidity shocks, but they exacerbate contagion when their voluntary liquid buffers are fully utilized.
- Business models of banks, their heterogeneity in sizes, and interconnectedness matter for the magnitude of losses under funding stress conditions.
Future work on more granular balance sheets of banks and asset managers may be needed to empirically analyze the two identified trade-offs. First, higher capital requirements may increase the resilience of the entire system by strengthening the capital position of individual banks. However, they may enhance contagion by homogenizing banks’ balance sheets. Second, while non-regulated asset managers may exacerbate contagion and fire sales, they can also provide flexible buffers and absorb the adverse effects of small liquidity shocks.
Related Link: Paper (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Fire Sales, Contagion Risk, Systemic Risk, Capital Requirement, Asset Management, Liquidity Risk, ECB
Previous ArticleCBK Publishes Cybersecurity Framework for Banking Sector in Kuwait
IAIS published technical specifications, questionnaires, and templates for 2020 Insurance Capital Standard (ICS) and Aggregation Method data collections.
BIS announced that it will establish new Innovation Hub centers across Europe and in North America in cooperation with member central banks.
FED updated the reporting form for FR 2052a, which is used to monitor the overall liquidity profile of certain supervised institutions.
PRA published a statement that sets out its views on certain amendments made to Capital Requirements Regulations (CRR and CRR2) via EU Regulation 2020/873 (CRR "Quick Fix"), including some guidance for firms.
The Climate Financial Risk Forum (CFRF), which is a joint climate risk forum of FCA and PRA, published a guide written by the industry for the industry to help firms approach and address climate-related financial risks.
IAIS published an application paper on liquidity risk management for insurers.
EBA published its response to the EC consultation on a new Digital Finance Strategy for Europe.
EIOPA responded to the EC consultation on a new digital finance strategy for Europe.
ESMA published its response to the EC consultation on the new digital finance strategy for EU.
FSB published, for consultation, a report on evaluation of the too-big-to-fail (TBTF) reforms for systemically important banks.