EBA published the final guidelines specifying conditions for the application of the alternative treatment of exposures related to tri-party repurchase agreements for large exposure purposes, as set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). The final guidelines, among others, set out the requirements on the conditions and frequency for determining, monitoring, and revising the limits specified by the institution. The guidelines will apply from June 28, 2021. The deadline for competent authorities to report whether they comply with the guidelines will be two months after the publication of the translations.
Under the alternative treatment, institutions are allowed to replace the total amount of their exposures to a collateral issuer due to tri-party repurchase agreements facilitated by a tri-party agent, with the full amount of the limits that the institution has instructed the tri-party agent to apply to those exposures. If institutions perform such a replacement, CRR requires them to comply with following three conditions:
- Institution must verify that the tri-party agent has in place appropriate safeguards to prevent breaches of the limits instructed by the institution
- Competent authority has not expressed to the institution any material concerns
- Sum of the limit instructed by the institution to the tri-party agent, and any other exposures of the institution to the collateral issuer, does not exceed the limit set out in CRR
In addition, the guidelines recommend a set of elements that an institution and a tri-party agent should include in their service agreement for the use of the alternative treatment. The guidelines establish a set of safeguards that the tri-party agent has to put in place and for which the institution needs to verify the appropriateness for the use of the alternative treatment. The guidelines also specify how institutions should determine the limits to be applied by a tri-party agent with regard to the securities of a collateral issuer as well as the general framework under which such limits can be revised. Finally, the guidelines include a non-exhaustive list of circumstances that could lead the competent authority to raise material concerns and that would prevent the use of the alternative treatment by institutions. A procedure for dealing with those material concerns is also specified.
Effective Date: June 28, 2021
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, CRR, Repurchase Agreement, Large Exposures, Basel, Repo, Concentration Risk, Credit Risk, Repo Transactions, EBA
Previous ArticleEIOPA Publishes Supervisory Convergence Priorities for 2021
FDIC is seeking comments on a rule to amend the interagency guidelines for real estate lending policies—also known as the Real Estate Lending Standards.
MAS revised Notices 637 and 1111 on the risk-based capital adequacy requirements, along with Notice 656 on the exposures to single counterparty groups for banks incorporated in Singapore.
ISDA is consulting on the implementation of fallbacks for the sterling LIBOR ICE Swap Rate and for the USD LIBOR ICE Swap Rate.
SEC announced that the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs released the Spring 2021 Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions.
BIS and BoE launched the BIS Innovation Hub Center in London, which is the fourth new Innovation Hub Centre to be opened in the past two years.
ESRB published recommendations on the reciprocation of macro-prudential measures in Belgium, France, Luxembourg, Norway, and Sweden.
MAS revised multiple notices that are applicable to banks and merchant banks in Singapore and have been issued pursuant to the Banking Act (Cap 19).
EC published the Delegated Regulation 2021/931, which supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or Regulation 575/2013) with regard to the regulatory technical standards specifying the method for identifying derivative transactions with one or more than one material risk driver.
BCBS is consulting on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures of banks.
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules under the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.