EBA published the final guidelines specifying conditions for the application of the alternative treatment of exposures related to tri-party repurchase agreements for large exposure purposes, as set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). The final guidelines, among others, set out the requirements on the conditions and frequency for determining, monitoring, and revising the limits specified by the institution. The guidelines will apply from June 28, 2021. The deadline for competent authorities to report whether they comply with the guidelines will be two months after the publication of the translations.
Under the alternative treatment, institutions are allowed to replace the total amount of their exposures to a collateral issuer due to tri-party repurchase agreements facilitated by a tri-party agent, with the full amount of the limits that the institution has instructed the tri-party agent to apply to those exposures. If institutions perform such a replacement, CRR requires them to comply with following three conditions:
- Institution must verify that the tri-party agent has in place appropriate safeguards to prevent breaches of the limits instructed by the institution
- Competent authority has not expressed to the institution any material concerns
- Sum of the limit instructed by the institution to the tri-party agent, and any other exposures of the institution to the collateral issuer, does not exceed the limit set out in CRR
In addition, the guidelines recommend a set of elements that an institution and a tri-party agent should include in their service agreement for the use of the alternative treatment. The guidelines establish a set of safeguards that the tri-party agent has to put in place and for which the institution needs to verify the appropriateness for the use of the alternative treatment. The guidelines also specify how institutions should determine the limits to be applied by a tri-party agent with regard to the securities of a collateral issuer as well as the general framework under which such limits can be revised. Finally, the guidelines include a non-exhaustive list of circumstances that could lead the competent authority to raise material concerns and that would prevent the use of the alternative treatment by institutions. A procedure for dealing with those material concerns is also specified.
Effective Date: June 28, 2021
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, CRR, Repurchase Agreement, Large Exposures, Basel, Repo, Concentration Risk, Credit Risk, Repo Transactions, EBA
Previous ArticleEIOPA Publishes Supervisory Convergence Priorities for 2021
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) announced that the Green and Sustainable Finance (GSF) Cross-Agency Steering Group has launched the information and data repositories and outlined the progress made in advancing the development of green and sustainable finance in Hong Kong.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published a report that explores the feasibility of integrating the G-Cubed general equilibrium model into the NGFS suite of models.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.