Joachim Wuermeling, a member of the Executive Board of Deutsche Bundesbank, spoke at the Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany in London. He discussed the implications of Brexit for UK branches of German banks. From the perspective of a bank and from the perspective of a banking supervisor, he mentioned that the future regime under which banks and companies, in general, will operate after March 29, 2019 remains unclear.
Prof. Joachim Wuermeling stated that UK branches of German banks (and Single Supervisory Mechanism, or SSM, banks in general) will need to become third-country branches, as per what is known at the moment. The temporary permissions regime of PRA certainly buys time. However, there is no alternative to conversion into third-country branches. So far, PRA has received some applications for third-country branch authorization in UK. For German banks, unlike other SSM banks, there is no formal requirement for the home supervisor to approve a third-country branch. However, given the aim of establishing a level playing field among all current and future SSM banks, it should be expected that the SSM addresses certain requirements via other supervisory measures, where necessary, to ensure that the future set-up of the new third-country branches is in line with the expectations of SSM. A third-country branch will not be allowed to perform central functions for its SSM domiciled group. Moreover, any outsourcing must not hamper the efficient and effective supervision of SSM entities. Not all SSM banks are currently fully compliant with the respective supervisory expectations of SSM.
Making the transition from the EU28 to the EU27 as smooth as possible for the financial sector will require close cooperation between SSM and PRA. The details of such a split of responsibilities are being negotiated. He discussed "....what a split of responsibilities would mean for UK branches of German (and other SSM) banks. The truth is: we can’t really tell just yet. We’ll have to wait for the final outcome of the negotiations between supervisory authorities. As I have said, these negotiations are already under way and I am optimistic that they will be concluded soon." Overall, the goal must be to achieve an adequate level of information-sharing and joint supervisory work that does not lead to an increased workload for all parties involved. The agreement on a split of responsibilities will need to leave room for accommodating specific cases. On the basis of the agreement, PRA plans to process applications for third-country branches. In the short run, the temporary permissions regime will mitigate the outcome of a possible hard Brexit.
Nevertheless, financial institutions must prepare thoroughly, although the outcome in the long run depends on the way Brexit re-shapes the European financial system. However, the uncertainty continues. Since the referendum in June 2016, both financial institutions and supervisors have put tremendous effort into better understanding and preparing for every possible outcome. Although some tasks are yet to be completed, most banks are well advanced in their preparations, said Prof. Wuermeling.
Related Link: Speech
Keywords: Europe, EU, UK, Germany, Banking, Brexit, SSM, Third Country Branches, Bundesbank, PRA, BIS
Previous ArticleECB Publishes Results of Survey on Credit Terms and Conditions
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on draft regulatory technical standards for the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts of collective investment undertakings or CIUs, in line with the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published a report that summarizes banking conditions in the United States, along with the supervisory and regulatory activities of FED.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) recently completed two pilot initiatives in its 2020-2024 Cyber Security Strategy, which was published in November 2020.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published further information related to its 2021 assessment of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), with additional details to help understand the scoring methodology.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is consulting on an Accounting Standards Update and the associated taxonomy improvements for requirements on troubled debt restructurings and vintage disclosures under the credit losses standard (for financial instruments) topic 326.
US Agencies issued a statement that summarizes the work undertaken during the interagency policy sprints focused on crypto-assets and provides a roadmap of future work related to crypto-assets.