ESMA published its response to EC consultation on review of the Benchmarks Regulation in EU. The ESMA response is focused on the cessation of critical benchmarks, parity between EU and third-country benchmarks, and transparency. EC will use this feedback to inform its recommendations on the effectiveness of the Benchmarks Regulation. These recommendations will be presented in a report to the European Parliament and Council.
In response to the consultation, ESMA provided the following views on the key issues:
- To enhance the critical benchmarks framework, ESMA proposed that competent authorities should be able to request an administrator to change its methodology. ESMA also proposed that the process of suspension or withdrawal of authorization or registration of an administrator and the assessment, by competent authorities, of the cessation procedures of the administrator should be clarified.
- To ensure a level playing field between EU and third-country benchmarks, ESMA proposed to take into account different alternative approaches when defining the scope of the Benchmarks Regulation
- To increase transparency to the benefit of benchmark users, ESMA proposed to include the list of both EU and third-country benchmarks in its register, together with an appropriate identification of benchmarks.
Under the Benchmarks Regulation, administrators of third country and critical benchmarks must apply for authorization by December 31, 2021, for their benchmarks to continue to be used in EU. Application date for the remaining administrators expired on January 01, 2020. So far, 70 EU administrators are authorized or registered under the Benchmarks Regulation, along with the nine third-country administrators, including six who were recognized, two endorsements, and one administrator following a positive equivalence decision. The Benchmarks Regulation came into force on January 01, 2018 and seeks to increase the robustness and reliability of financial benchmarks.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Benchmarks Regulation, Critical Benchmarks, Transparency, IBOR Reform, ESMA
Previous ArticleESRB Publishes Member State Notifications on O-SII and G-SII Buffers
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published bulletins on lending in decentralized finance (DeFi) system, on blockchain scalability and fragmentation of crypto, and on extractable value and market manipulation in crypto and decentralized finance.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.