FED published a technical paper that describes the Forward-Looking Analysis of Risk Events (FLARE) model. FLARE is a top-down model that helps assess how well the banking system is positioned to weather exogenous macroeconomic shocks. FLARE estimates banking system capital under varying macroeconomic scenarios, time horizons, and other systemic shocks. The paper describes the major model assumptions and the projection procedures and addresses how the underlying structures of DFAST and FLARE differ and how their results compare. The paper also outlines the current plans to enhance FLARE.
While Dodd Frank Act Stress Tests (DFAST) and the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) exercises are critical policy tools for assessing the health of large banks, FED has worked to build additional tools to assess the resilience of the banking system and to address macro-prudential goals. The Forward-Looking Analysis of Risk Events (FLARE) model is one such tool. FLARE complements DFAST in at least three ways:
- First, using publicly available DFAST macro scenarios, FLARE forms a benchmark assessment of banking system resiliency, as measured by changes in banking system capital.
- Second, FLARE is flexible. Its specifications are easily updated to reflect the evolving banking system financial conditions, the length of scenarios can be changed, and alternative data sources can be incorporated. FLARE’s modularity also allows satellite models to build in feedback effects and fire sales.
- Finally, because FLARE primarily uses public data, it can test the financial strength of bank holding companies, including those not in DFAST.
FLARE can be adapted to address macro-prudential stress testing goals. While the DFAST exercise remains critical to assessing banking system vulnerabilities and individual large bank safety and soundness, many macro-prudential policy topics, such as funding shocks and fire sales, are outside of the current structure of the public DFAST process. FLARE can be used to answer questions that may not be addressed by public DFAST scenarios. As an example, FLARE was recently used to assess the impact of prolonged low interest rates, reduced term spreads, and modest gross domestic product (GDP) growth on banking system performance. The tool also informs judgments of the resiliency of the entire banking system, not just large banks, and can be used to assess the relative severity of different macroeconomic scenarios. FLARE uses FR Y-9C data to project bank holding companies' earnings, losses, and capital under varying macroeconomic scenarios.
With respect to the future plans for FLARE, the model development will likely focus on two types of improvements in the short-term. First, several loan portfolios estimated in FLARE could be improved by including risk-taking data available through FR Y-14 and other sources. Similar to the refinements implemented for credit card net charge-offs, the first priority is to focus on incorporating risk measures that add to the macro sensitivity of the model and inform loss estimates. Second, to bring more depth to FLARE as a macro-prudential tool, the balance sheet needs to be more dynamic. As part of that, the current funding shock overlay can be improved and longer scenarios can be considered to incorporate a prolonged period of very low interest rates or a “double-dip” recession. In addition, the future versions of FLARE should estimate how fire sales may pose a risk to banking system resiliency.
Related Link: FED Paper
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Stress Testing, FLARE Model, Top Down Stress Test, DFAST, CCAR, Systemic Risk, Regulatory Capital, Fire Sales, FED
Previous ArticleFDIC Publishes Annual Report for 2019
HKMA announced the publication of a report on fintech adoption and innovation in the banking industry in Hong Kong.
BIS published a working paper that examines the drivers of cyber risk, especially in context of the cloud services.
ECB launched consultation on a guide specifying how the Banking Supervision expects banks to consider climate-related and environmental risks in their governance and risk management frameworks and when formulating and implementing their business strategy.
ECB published an opinion (CON/2020/16) on amendments to the prudential framework in EU in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
EBA published a report that examines the interlinkages between recovery and resolution planning under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD).
SRB published the final Minimum Requirements for Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) policy under the Banking Package.
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) published a final rule that makes technical changes to the March 31, 2020 interim final rule that provides a five-year transition period for the impact of the current expected credit loss (CECL) methodology on regulatory capital.
ECB published results of the March 2020 survey on credit terms and conditions in euro-denominated securities financing and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets.
FINMA published guidance (06/2020) on extending or discontinuing various exemptions that were granted due to the COVID-19 crisis.
SRB launched a consultation on the minimum data needed for valuation of a bank in resolution.