OCC published the baseline and severely adverse scenarios for use in the upcoming Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test (DFAST) exercise for covered institutions. OCC has also published the reporting templates and instructions for data collection, which is implemented through the DAST-14A report. OCC specified that Category III banks are not required to submit stress testing data in the 2021 DFAST reporting year but these banks will be required to submit again in 2022.
OCC has developed these supervisory scenarios in coordination with the FED and FDIC. The scenarios start in the first quarter of 2021 and extend through the first quarter of 2024. Each scenario includes 28 variables; this set of variables is the same as those provided in last year’s supervisory scenarios. Each scenario includes economic variables, including macroeconomic activity, unemployment, exchange rates, prices, income, and interest rates. The baseline scenario for international economic activity and inflation features a relatively steady expansion in activity, albeit one that proceeds at different rates across countries. The severely adverse scenario, however, is characterized by a severe global recession accompanied by a period of heightened stress in commercial real estate and corporate debt markets. The international component of this scenario features severe recessions in the euro area, the United Kingdom, and Japan, along with a significant deceleration in activity in developing Asia.
Certain national banks and federal savings associations are required to conduct the company-run stress tests under the Dodd-Frank Act. OCC specifies that covered institutions are required to submit the results of their company-run stress tests by April 5 and publish those results between June 15 and July 15 each year. The results of the company-run stress tests provide OCC with the forward-looking information that is used in bank supervision and assists the agency in assessing the risk profile and capital adequacy of a company. The objective of the company-run stress test is to ensure that institutions have robust, forward-looking capital planning processes that account for their unique risks and to help ensure that institutions have sufficient capital to continue operations throughout times of economic and financial stress. These stress test results are also expected to support ongoing improvement in a covered institution's stress testing practices with respect to its internal assessments of capital adequacy and overall capital planning.
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, DFAST, Reporting, Stress Testing, Baseline Scenario, Severely Adverse Scenario, DFAST 14A, OCC
Previous ArticleJFSA Publishes Q&A on Capital Adequacy Ratio and TLAC Regulations
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.