EU published Regulation 2021/168, which amends the Benchmarks Regulation (2016/1011) with respect to the exemption of certain third-country spot foreign exchange benchmarks and the designation of replacements for certain benchmarks in cessation. The amendments have been made against the background of an expected phasing-out of the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) by the end of 2021. The new rules are intended to reduce legal uncertainty and avoid risks to financial stability by making sure that a statutory replacement rate can be put in place by the time a systemically important benchmark is no longer in use. Regulation 2021/168 shall enter into force and apply from the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
European Council had adopted these amendments on February 02, 2021. Regulation 2021/168 highlights that, to enable entities in EU to continue their business activities while mitigating foreign-exchange risk, certain spot foreign exchange benchmarks that are used in financial instruments to calculate contractual payouts and that are designated by EC in accordance with certain criteria have been excluded from the scope of Benchmarks Regulation. The current transitional period for third-country benchmarks has been extended. EC has been given the power to further extend the transitional period by means of a delegated act, for a maximum of two years, if the assessment on which that review is based demonstrates that the envisaged expiry of the transitional period would be detrimental to the continued use of third-country benchmarks in EU or would pose a threat to financial stability.
To ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of Regulation 2021/168, implementing powers have been conferred on EC to designate a replacement for a benchmark to replace all references to that benchmark in contracts. EC should exercise its implementing powers only in situations where it assesses that the cessation or wind-down of a benchmark may result in negative consequences that significantly disrupt the functioning of financial markets or the real economy in the Union. Furthermore, EC should exercise its implementing powers only where it has become clear that the representativeness of the benchmark concerned cannot be restored or that the benchmark will cease permanently. Before exercising its implementing powers to designate a replacement for a benchmark, EC should conduct a public consultation and should take into account recommendations by relevant stakeholders and in particular by private sector working groups operating under the auspices of the public authorities or the central bank.
At the time of the adoption of Benchmark Regulation it was expected that, by the end of 2021, third countries would establish similar regulatory regimes for financial benchmarks and that the use, in EU by supervised entities, of third-country benchmarks would be ensured by equivalence decisions adopted by EC or by the recognition or endorsement granted by competent authorities. However, limited progress has been made in that regard. The scope of the regulatory regime for financial benchmarks differs significantly between EU and third countries. Therefore, to ensure the smooth functioning of the internal market and the availability of third-country benchmarks for use in EU after the end of the transitional period, EC should, by June 15, 2023, present a report on the review of the scope of Benchmarks Regulation, as amended by Regulation 2021/168, with regard to its effect on the use of third-country benchmarks in EU. In that report, EC should analyze the consequences of the far-reaching scope of such regulation for EU administrators and users of benchmarks also with respect to the continued use of third-country benchmarks. EC should also assess whether there is a need to further amend the Benchmarks Regulationto reduce its scope only to administrators of certain types of benchmarks or to administrators whose benchmarks are widely used in EU.
Effective Date: February 13, 2021
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, LIBOR, Interest Rate Benchmark, Benchmark Reforms, Systemic Risk, Benchmarks Regulation, EC, European Parliament, European Council
Across 35 years in banking, Blake has gained deep insights into the inner working of this sector. Over the last two decades, Blake has been an Operating Committee member, leading teams and executing strategies in Credit and Enterprise Risk as well as Line of Business. His focus over this time has been primarily Commercial/Corporate with particular emphasis on CRE. Blake has spent most of his career with large and mid-size banks. Blake joined Moody’s Analytics in 2021 after leading the transformation of the credit approval and reporting process at a $25 billion bank.
Previous ArticleBoE Announces Consultation on Successor Rate to GBP LIBOR
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) announced that the Green and Sustainable Finance (GSF) Cross-Agency Steering Group has launched the information and data repositories and outlined the progress made in advancing the development of green and sustainable finance in Hong Kong.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published a report that explores the feasibility of integrating the G-Cubed general equilibrium model into the NGFS suite of models.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.