Featured Product

    BIS Paper Studies Incentives of For-Profit CCPs with Limited Liability

    February 11, 2019

    BIS published a working paper that studies the incentives of a for-profit central counterparties (CCP) with limited liability. A CCP faces a trade-off between fee income and counterparty credit risk. The paper investigates whether such CCP incentives undermine financial stability.

    Such for-profit CCPs choose how much capital to hold and set the collateral requirement for their clearing members, to maximize their own profits. They face a trade-off between fee income and counterparty credit risk. However, the limited liability of a CCP creates a misalignment between its choices and the socially optimal solution to this trade-off. In studying the factors that give rise to this misalignment, the paper derives the optimal capital regulations and examines the significant role of CCP ownership structures in safeguarding financial stability. This is the first paper that argues that a for-profit CCP would seek to hold less capital than is optimal from a social welfare perspective and, similarly, would require less collateral from its members than is optimal, thus undermining financial stability. From an empirical angle, this paper also provides the first evidence of a relationship between the capital held by CCPs and the collateral they require.

    The model developed in this paper implies that better-capitalized CCPs set higher collateral requirements. Empirical evidence suggests that a 1% increase in a for-profit CCP's capital is associated with a 0.6% increase in its members' collateral. Another implication, again deriving from its capitalization and collateral choices, is that a for-profit CCP is more likely to fail than is socially optimal. By contrast, a user-owned CCP chooses to hold more capital and is, therefore, less likely to fail. The data show that user-owned CCPs hold significantly more capital, on average, than for-profit CCPs do. Optimal capital requirements are derived for different levels of the clearing fees charged by for-profit CCPs. When this fee is low, the capital requirements incentivize CCPs to demand more collateral, thus bolstering financial stability. When fees are high, capital requirements do not change a CCP's incentives but serve to boost its loss-absorbing capacity.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: International, PMI, Banking, Securities, CCPs, Financial Stability, Capital Requirements, BIS

    Related Articles
    News

    FSB Report Examines Implementation and Impact of G20 Financial Reforms

    FSB published fifth annual report on the implementation and effects of the G20 financial regulatory reforms.

    October 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Launches Consultation on Comprehensive Pillar 3 Disclosures

    EBA proposed the new comprehensive implementing technical standard (ITS) for public disclosures by financial institutions.

    October 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Consults on Revised Technical Standards on Supervisory Reporting

    EBA launched a consultation on the revised implementing technical standards, or ITS, on supervisory reporting.

    October 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Proposes Measures to Strengthen Capital for Bank Depositors

    APRA proposed changes to APS 111, which is the prudential standard on measuring capital adequacy and establishes the criteria for regulatory capital requirements of authorized deposit-taking institutions.

    October 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Report Examines Implementation of OTC Derivative Reforms

    FSB published annual progress report on implementation of the agreed G20 reforms for over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets.

    October 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Publishes Update on Its Market Fragmentation Work

    FSB published an update on its work to address the issue of market fragmentation.

    October 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FCA Releases Feedback to Online Survey on New Data Collection Platform

    FCA published results of the survey requesting feedback for the new data collection platform that will replace GABRIEL.

    October 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Reduces Countercyclical Capital Buffer in Hong Kong to 2.0%

    HKMA announced that the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for banks in Hong Kong has been reduced from 2.5% to 2.0%, with immediate effect, in accordance with the Banking (Capital) Rules.

    October 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Consults on Implementation of Final Basel III Reforms in EU

    EC launched a public consultation on the implementation of Basel III standards in EU.

    October 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    MAS Amends Regulation on Clearing of Derivatives Contracts

    MAS amended regulation for the mandatory centralized clearing of certain derivative contracts.

    October 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3971