HKMA is consulting the banking industry on revisions to the Supervisory Policy Module CG-3 on Code of Conduct, with the comment period closing on April 09, 2021. The proposed revisions have been highlighted in track changes, with key revisions relating to the Application, Oversight by Senior Management, and Internal Control sections of the module. In general, the module sets out the minimum standards that HKMA expects authorized institutions to adopt in respect of their codes of conduct and elements of an effective system for enforcing the Codes.
The policy module applies to all authorized institutions. In the case of locally incorporated authorized institutions, the scope should cover all their branches and subsidiaries subject to the consolidated supervision of HKMA. An overseas-incorporated authorized institution may adopt the Code of Conduct formulated at the group level if it can demonstrate to the satisfaction of HKMA that the relevant group policy is consistent with the requirements set out in this module, or with certain other prescribed conditions. Failure to adhere to the standards and requirements in this module may call into question whether an authorized institution continues to satisfy certain criteria under seventh Schedule to the Banking Ordinance. This module should be read in conjunction with other relevant Supervisory Policy Manual modules, including CG-1 “Corporate Governance of Locally Incorporated Authorized Institutions” in the case of locally incorporated authorized institutions, CG-5 “Guideline on a Sound Remuneration System,” and CG-6 “Competence and Ethical Behavior,” as well as any other applicable guidance issued and updated by HKMA.
Comment Due Date: April 09, 2021
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, Code of Conduct, Banking Ordinance, Supervisory Policy Manual, Governance, Operational Risk, HKMA
Previous ArticleFSC Taiwan Grants License to Internet-Only Banks in Taiwan
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority of Germany (BaFin) proposed to amend the “Capital Investment Conduct And Organization Ordinance” and issued a draft circular on the minimum resolvability requirements for resolution planning.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed guidelines, for the resolution authorities, on the publication of the write-down and conversion and bail-in exchange mechanic, with the comment period ending on September 07, 2022.
The Financial Services Authority of Indonesia (OJK) is strengthening cooperation with the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Japanese Financial Services Agency (JFSA)
The European Parliament and the Council published Regulation 2022/868 on European data governance (Data Governance Act).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published phase 2 of its reporting framework 3.2. The technical package supports the implementation of the updated reporting framework by providing standard specifications