European Parliament published a brief report that analyzes the key differences between the U.S. and the Banking Union resolution and liquidation framework, including differences in terms of funding arrangements. In view of recent liquidation and resolution experiences, the report assesses what an EU insolvency regime would bring to the Banking Union both in terms of small and medium-size banks’ resolution and in terms of strengthening the existing Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) resolution framework. The briefing finally outlines the key building blocks of an EU liquidation regime for the Banking Union.
As part of its July 2018 assessment of the Euro area, IMF recommended to entrust SRB with administrative liquidation powers, along the lines of the U.S. FDIC. Based on the FDIC experience, this would mean entrusting SRB with insolvency tools akin to resolution to deal with failing banks that do not meet the public interest test. At the December ECON hearing, the SRB Chair portrayed the FDIC model as a way to wind up small and medium-size institutions while protecting insured depositors. At the December 06 ECON hearing, the SRB Chair advocated a framework that links depositor protection (that is, Deposit Guarantee Scheme) and gives the chance to unwind small- and medium-size banks under national insolvency proceedings, referring to the FDIC. The report concludes that adopting the U.S. FDIC model in the Banking Union would imply further harmonization on three fronts:
- An EU bank insolvency framework
- Further supervisory functions for SRB
- European Deposit Insurance Scheme underpinned by further harmonization of the DGS Directive
Related Link: Report
Keywords: Europe, EU, US, Banking, SRB, Resolution Framework, BRRD, FDIC, European Parliament
Previous ArticleFSB Chair Randal Quarles Speaks About the Upcoming Work of FSB
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on asset encumbrance in banking sector.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a methodological guide to mystery shopping.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released a letter to authorized deposit-taking institutions to provide an update on key policy settings for the capital framework reforms, which will come into effect from January 01, 2023.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) published a report that assesses the business continuity planning activities of financial market infrastructures or FMIs.
The Bank of England (BoE) published questions and answers (Q&A) on OSCA to BEEDS migration for statistical reporting as well a presentation from the project overview session held with statistical reporters.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) is consulting on a technical amendment to the Basel Framework to reflect a new process reviewing the global systemically important bank (G-SIB) assessment methodology.