EIOPA published a report on the approach and lessons learned from the first crisis walkthrough exercise. EIOPA conducted this exercise with one national supervisory authority that volunteered to participate. The walkthrough exercise was intended to test the crisis processes and procedures and to assess the way in which participants interacted in terms of exchanging information, cooperating, and adopting decisions. The report emphasizes that authorities in charge of financial stability need to develop very flexible crisis management procedures to deal with unexpected events and to quickly mitigate the consequences of a developing crisis.
The exercise was aimed at making participants think what could be the best course of action that they could follow in a given situation and making them aware of potential inconsistencies or limitations in their decision-making processes. The following are the key lessons learned from the exercise:
- The need to have in place comprehensive crisis procedures and to test them. It is clear that all crisis situations cannot be foreseen in advance and that flexibility is needed. However, having a comprehensive crisis roadmap in place allows to identify potential vulnerabilities, facilitates crisis management and orderly escalation, and provides Senior Management and relevant staff with a structured way of thinking.
- The importance of testing the relevant documents of the groups. A real crisis might look different than any of the forecasted scenarios by groups in their own stress testing or risk management related documentation. However, having credible and realistic plans, processes, and roadmaps can help undertakings and groups identify potential vulnerabilities, try to minimize their impact, and assess the effectiveness of the measures considered.
- The need to supplement the current regulatory toolkit with additional recovery and resolution tools. During the exercise, the need for management actions and recovery measures to be potentially taken was debated by participants, as the simulated insurance group faced severed distress and even near-default. There was broad agreement on the need to supplement the current regulatory toolkit with potential new tools that could be appropriate in the recovery or resolution phases.
- The importance of cooperation among national supervisory authorities and EIOPA during idiosyncratic crises. The exercise showed the relevance of cooperation among all relevant parties. One of the critical aspects analyzed was whether or when the national supervisory authority would contact EIOPA and/or other potentially affected stakeholders in an idiosyncratic crisis, which ex ante may seem to be contained at the national level and not pose any EU-wide impact yet.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Crisis Walkthrough Exercise, Recovery and Resolution, Crisis Management Framework, Resolution Framework, Lessons Learned, Solvency II, EIOPA
Previous ArticleBank of Italy Publishes Version 1.9 of AnaCredit Reporting Manual
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).