BCBS Study Examines Initial Experience with G-SIB Framework
BCBS published a working paper that analyzes the initial experience with the global systemically important bank (G-SIB) framework. The paper investigates whether G-SIBs and non-G-SIBs have behaved differently since the implementation of the G-SIB framework and if observed differences in behavior are in accordance with the aims of the framework. It also examines the regional differences in the behavior of G-SIBs and non-G-SIBs.
The analysis reveals that G-SIBs and non-G-SIBs behave differently; however, both groups are heterogeneous, so that the indicator outcomes are often highly influenced by a few banks. Nevertheless, most G-SIBs have reduced their G-SIB scores during the period assessed, changing their balance sheets in ways that are consistent with the aims of the G-SIB framework. In contrast, non-G-SIBs have increased their relative G-SIB scores during the same period. Finally, the regional analysis indicates that trends in banks' G-SIB indicators, and the indicators that contribute most to the final G-SIB score, are heterogeneous across countries and regions. While G-SIBs from the euro area, Great Britain, and the United States have reduced their systemic importance for most indicators, Chinese and Japanese G-SIBs showed relatively positive growth rates for all indicators—and particularly high ones for indicators in the substitutability category.""
For this analysis, the sample of G-SIBs and non-G-SIBs were divided into six and 10 countries or regions. G-SIBs were grouped into United States, Euro area, non-euro area, Great Britain, China, and Japan. The non-G-SIBs were grouped into euro area (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Spain); non-euro area, United States, Canada, China, Australia, Japan, Korea, and Others (non-G-SIBs of Brazil, India, Russia, and Singapore).
Related Links
Keywords: International, Banking, G-SIB, Systemic Risk, G-SIB Framework, Macro-prudential Assessment, BCBS
Previous Article
Bundesbank Updates Derivation Rules for Completeness Check Under SSMRelated Articles
|
News
EC Amends Regulation Supplementing Solvency II DirectiveEC published the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/981 that amends the Regulation (EU) 2015/35, which supplements Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EC) on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of insurance and reinsurance.
June 18, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
IOSCO Report Examines Application of International Cyber StandardsIOSCO published a final report that examines the application of the three internationally recognized cyber standards and frameworks by IOSCO member jurisdictions.
June 18, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
PRA Launches 2019 Stress Test Exercise for Life and General InsurersPRA has launched the biennial insurance stress test and is asking the largest regulated life and general insurers to provide information about the impact of a range of stress tests on their business.
June 18, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
PRA Finalizes Reporting Amendments to Pillar 2 Liquidity FrameworkPRA published the final Policy Statement PS13/19 on regulatory reporting amendments and clarifications to the Pillar 2 liquidity framework for banks in UK.
June 17, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FSB Assesses Implementation of Compensation Standards and PrinciplesFSB published the sixth progress report on the implementation of its principles and standards for sound compensation practices in financial institutions.
June 17, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
IMF Publishes Reports on 2019 Article IV Consultation with IrelandIMF published its staff report and selected issues report under the 2019 Article IV consultation with Ireland.
June 17, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA Updates Data on Deposit Guarantee Schemes in EUEBA published the 2018 data on two key concepts in the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive (DGSD)—namely, available financial means and covered deposits.
June 17, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
SNB Updates Form for Reporting Solvency Risk of CounterpartiesSNB published the survey (Form Release 5.01) and related documentation for reporting solvency risk of counterparties in the interbank sector (ARIS).
June 17, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
ISDA Studies Variation in Global Implementation of Margin RequirementsISDA published a paper that highlights the main areas of difference in the implementation of margin requirements for non-cleared derivatives across jurisdictions and makes recommendations on how to resolve these variations.
June 17, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
US Agencies Finalize Rule to Streamline Reporting for Small BanksUS Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule to streamline the regulatory reporting requirements for small institutions.
June 17, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
