BCBS Study Examines Initial Experience with G-SIB Framework
BCBS published a working paper that analyzes the initial experience with the global systemically important bank (G-SIB) framework. The paper investigates whether G-SIBs and non-G-SIBs have behaved differently since the implementation of the G-SIB framework and if observed differences in behavior are in accordance with the aims of the framework. It also examines the regional differences in the behavior of G-SIBs and non-G-SIBs.
The analysis reveals that G-SIBs and non-G-SIBs behave differently; however, both groups are heterogeneous, so that the indicator outcomes are often highly influenced by a few banks. Nevertheless, most G-SIBs have reduced their G-SIB scores during the period assessed, changing their balance sheets in ways that are consistent with the aims of the G-SIB framework. In contrast, non-G-SIBs have increased their relative G-SIB scores during the same period. Finally, the regional analysis indicates that trends in banks' G-SIB indicators, and the indicators that contribute most to the final G-SIB score, are heterogeneous across countries and regions. While G-SIBs from the euro area, Great Britain, and the United States have reduced their systemic importance for most indicators, Chinese and Japanese G-SIBs showed relatively positive growth rates for all indicators—and particularly high ones for indicators in the substitutability category.""
For this analysis, the sample of G-SIBs and non-G-SIBs were divided into six and 10 countries or regions. G-SIBs were grouped into United States, Euro area, non-euro area, Great Britain, China, and Japan. The non-G-SIBs were grouped into euro area (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Spain); non-euro area, United States, Canada, China, Australia, Japan, Korea, and Others (non-G-SIBs of Brazil, India, Russia, and Singapore).
Related Links
Keywords: International, Banking, G-SIB, Systemic Risk, G-SIB Framework, Macro-prudential Assessment, BCBS
Previous Article
Bundesbank Updates Derivation Rules for Completeness Check Under SSMRelated Articles
|
News
EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Fourth Update for March 2019EBA published answers to five questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.
March 22, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
ECB Updates Validation Checks and List of Identifiers Under AnaCreditECB updated the AnaCredit validation checks (Version 1.4) and the list of national identifiers (version 2.4) for AnaCredit reporting.
March 21, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
BCBS Publishes Results of the Basel III Monitoring ExerciseBCBS published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on data as of June 30, 2018.
March 20, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA, FCA, and PRA Agree on MoU Template for Supervisory CooperationEBA, FCA, and PRA announced that they have agreed on a template for the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) that sets out the expectations for supervisory cooperation and information-sharing arrangements between UK and EU/European Economic Area national authorities.
March 20, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
HKMA Publishes CoP on Loss-Absorbing Capacity Requirements of BanksHKMA issued, in relation to the Financial Institutions Resolution (Loss-Absorbing Capacity Requirements—Banking Sector) Rules (LAC Rules) a chapter of a code of practice (LAC CoP) under section 196 of the Financial Institutions Resolution Ordinance (FIRO).
March 20, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA Publishes Reports Monitoring the Implementation of Basel III in EUEBA published two reports measuring the impact of implementing the final Basel III reforms and monitoring the implementation of liquidity measures in EU.
March 20, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
BCBS Publishes Results of Survey on Proportionality in Bank RegulationBCBS published a report presenting the results of a survey conducted on proportionality practices in bank regulation and supervision.
March 19, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
US Agencies Adopt Interim Rule to Facilitate Transfers of Legacy SwapsUS Agencies (FCA, FDIC, FED, FHFA, and OCC) are adopting and inviting comments on an interim final rule.
March 19, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA Updates List of Other Systemically Important Institutions in EUEBA updated the 2018 list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU. The list also reflects the additional capital buffers that the relevant authorities have set for the identified O-SIIs.
March 19, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
HKMA Expects Banks to Manage Risks Related to Crypto-Asset ExposuresHKMA issued a statement announcing that it expects authorized institutions to take note of the BCBS statement on crypto-assets and its prudential expectations.
March 18, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
