ESAs published final report on the draft regulatory technical standards for the content, methodologies, and presentation of sustainability-related disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation or SFDR. These standards reflect the responses to the consultation that was launched on April 23, 2020. The standards also contain templates for pre-contractual and periodic product disclosures that were subject to an online public survey and to two consumer testing exercises conducted in the Netherlands and Poland. ESAs have delivered this final report to EC, which is expected to endorse the technical standards within three months of their publication.
The proposed standards aim to improve environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures to end-investors on the principal adverse impacts of investment decisions and on the sustainability features of a wide range of financial products. This will help to respond to investor demands for sustainable products and reduce the risk of greenwashing. The SFDR empowers ESAs to develop technical standards on entity-level principal adverse impact disclosures and product-level disclosures:
- Entity-level principal adverse impact disclosures—The principal adverse impact of investment decisions on sustainability factors should be disclosed on the website of an entity. The disclosure should take the form of a statement showing how investments adversely impact indicators in relation to climate and environment, social and employee matters, respect for human rights, and anti-corruption and anti-bribery. ESAs have updated the list of indicators for principal adverse impacts. The principal adverse impact reporting in the SFDR is based on the principle of proportionality; for companies with fewer than 500 employees, the entity-level principal adverse impact reporting applies on a comply-or-explain basis.
- Product-level disclosures—The sustainability characteristics or objectives of financial products are to be disclosed in an annex to the respective sectoral pre-contractual and periodic documentation in mandatory templates and on the websites of providers. The proposals included in the draft technical standards relate to the rules for how this disclosure should be carried out, ensuring transparency to investors regarding how products meet their sustainability characteristics or objectives. They also set out the disclosures that should be provided by products that have designated an index as a reference benchmark. Finally, the product-level proposals set out suggested provisions for disclosing how a product based on sustainable investments complies with the "do not significantly harm" principle.
While financial market participants and financial advisers are required to apply most of the provisions on sustainability-related disclosures laid down in the SFDR from March 10. 2021, the application of the technical standards will be delayed to a later date. In these draft standards, ESAs have proposed the application date of the standards to be January 01, 2022. ESAs plan to issue a public supervisory statement before the application date of SFDR, to achieve an effective and consistent application of the requirements of SFDR and consistent national supervision of the SFDR. ESAs will also publish a consultation on taxonomy-related product disclosures under the Taxonomy Regulation, which amends the empowerments in Articles 8(4), 9(6), and 11(5) of the SFDR.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Sustainability-Relate Disclosures, Climate Change Risk, Sustainable Finance, Disclosures, ESG, Taxonomy Regulation, SFDR, EC, ESAs
Previous ArticleUS Agencies Propose to Amend Call Reports, FFIEC 002, and FFIEC 002S
BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community.
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting