ECB published a working paper that analyzes the effect of bank capital requirements on the structure and risk of a financial system where markets, regulated banks, and shadow banks coexist. The issues addressed in the paper include the difference between regulated and shadow banks in the context of direct market finance; the type of borrowers funded by these institutions; the ways in which bank capital regulation affects lending through these channels; and the impact of the existence of shadow banks on the effectiveness of Basel III.
The paper presents the model of bank lending under moral hazard in which banks are not regulated and have to pay a cost to certify their capital. The paper analyzes the effects of flat and Value-at-Risk (VaR) requirements on the structure and risk of the financial system. It also characterizes optimal capital requirements and considers the effect of changes in funding costs and of endogenizing the cost of capital. Appendix A shows that the qualitative results remain unchanged when the advantage of regulated banks relative to shadow banks comes from the existence of underpriced deposit insurance. Appendix B contains the proofs of the analytical results.
The analysis shows how tighter risk-insensitive (sensitive) capital requirements can lead to a shift of intermediate (high) risk entrepreneurs from regulated to unregulated finance. This results in an increase in the default probability of entrepreneurs that shift and, therefore, in an unintended consequence of capital regulation that can lead to a riskier financial system. The analysis also reveals the ways in which optimal capital regulation must consider the existence of unregulated finance, whose presence imposes a constraint on the regulator, which leads to lower optimal capital requirements.
Related Link: ECB Working Paper (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Basel III, Shadow Banking, Capital Requirements, Credit Risk, ECB
A well-recognized researcher in the field; offers many years of experience in the real estate ﬁnance industry, and leads research efforts in expanding credit risk analytics to commercial real estate.
Previous ArticleECB Publishes Results of the 2018 Stress Test for Banks
OSFI has set out the near-term priorities for federally regulated financial institutions and federally regulated private pension plans for the coming months until March 31, 2022.
Under the Italian G20 Presidency, BIS Innovation Hub and the Italian central bank BDI launched the second edition of the G20 TechSprint on the lookout for innovative solutions to resolve operational problems in green and sustainable finance.
EBA proposed the regulatory technical standards on a central database on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) in EU.
ECB published its response to the targeted EC consultation on the review of the bank crisis management and deposit insurance framework in EU.
ACPR published Version 1.0.0 of the RUBA taxonomy, which will come into force from the decree of January 31, 2022.
BCBS, CPMI, and IOSCO (the Committees) are inviting entities that participate in market infrastructures and securities markets through an intermediary as well as non-bank intermediaries to complete voluntary surveys on the use of margin calls.
ECB published Decision 2021/752 to amend Decision 2019/1311 on the third series of targeted longer-term refinancing operations or TLTRO III.
The Central Bank of Ireland published Version 2.7 of the draft credit data template and rules for monthly AnaCredit reporting by banks.
OSFI proposed revisions to the Basel Capital Adequacy Reporting (BCAR) and leverage requirements returns for the 2023 reporting, with the comment period ending on July 09, 2021.
EBA published a discussion paper on review of the standardized nonperforming loans (NPL) transaction data templates, along with the proposed revised NPL data templates.