ECB published a working paper that analyzes the effect of bank capital requirements on the structure and risk of a financial system where markets, regulated banks, and shadow banks coexist. The issues addressed in the paper include the difference between regulated and shadow banks in the context of direct market finance; the type of borrowers funded by these institutions; the ways in which bank capital regulation affects lending through these channels; and the impact of the existence of shadow banks on the effectiveness of Basel III.
The paper presents the model of bank lending under moral hazard in which banks are not regulated and have to pay a cost to certify their capital. The paper analyzes the effects of flat and Value-at-Risk (VaR) requirements on the structure and risk of the financial system. It also characterizes optimal capital requirements and considers the effect of changes in funding costs and of endogenizing the cost of capital. Appendix A shows that the qualitative results remain unchanged when the advantage of regulated banks relative to shadow banks comes from the existence of underpriced deposit insurance. Appendix B contains the proofs of the analytical results.
The analysis shows how tighter risk-insensitive (sensitive) capital requirements can lead to a shift of intermediate (high) risk entrepreneurs from regulated to unregulated finance. This results in an increase in the default probability of entrepreneurs that shift and, therefore, in an unintended consequence of capital regulation that can lead to a riskier financial system. The analysis also reveals the ways in which optimal capital regulation must consider the existence of unregulated finance, whose presence imposes a constraint on the regulator, which leads to lower optimal capital requirements.
Related Link: ECB Working Paper (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Basel III, Shadow Banking, Capital Requirements, Credit Risk, ECB
A well-recognized researcher in the field; offers many years of experience in the real estate ﬁnance industry, and leads research efforts in expanding credit risk analytics to commercial real estate.
Previous ArticleECB Publishes Results of the 2018 Stress Test for Banks
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.