General Information & Client Services
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
December 27, 2017

IFSB issued a working paper (WP-07) on recovery, resolution, and insolvency issues for Institutions offering Islamic Financial Services (IIFS). The paper sheds light on several legal, structural, and operational issues in the context of recovery, resolution, and insolvency for IIFS. It endeavors to make policymakers, regulators, deposit insurance providers, and individual institutions aware of these challenges. The paper reiterates the need to harmonize Sharīʻah principles of recovery and resolution plans as well as bankruptcy and insolvency frameworks that are embodied in the existing legal systems.

The working paper also examines the applicability of FSB's Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for Financial Institutions and other relevant international standards on this subject for IIFS. It identifies gaps in implementation of these standards, since these international standards do not take cognizance of unique characteristics of these institutions. The paper also examines the possibilities of adopting self-insured structures and mechanisms to help safeguard the IFSI. In this regard, bail-in features embedded in Additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 ṣukūk from regulatory and Sharīʻah perspectives are discussed in detail. The paper also attempts to investigate whether the bail-in concept of a mandatory debt write-down by a resolution authority is compatible with Sharīʻah. Overall, the paper aims to:

  • Review the requirements of a robust recovery and resolution framework through literature review and jurisdictional analysis
  • Consider and analyze key recovery, resolution, and bankruptcy principles in the context of Islamic finance industry practices and Sharīʻah requirements
  • Indicate issues that require further consideration by regulatory authorities/policymakers and IIFS regarding recovery, resolution, and bankruptcy

Additionally, the paper examines the treatment of investment account holders in an insolvency and the treatment of the profit equalization reserve (PER) and investment risk reserve (IRR) funds in this scenario. The discussions also highlight Sharīʻah debates on whether any profit-sharing investment accounts should be afforded Sharīʻah-compliant deposit insurance scheme, given their risk-sharing nature. The paper also focuses on recovery and resolutions aspects for debt-based contracts in Islamic finance, since a majority of global Islamic banking assets are based on these contracts.


Related Links

Keywords: International, Banking, Islamic Banking, IIFS, Recovery and Resolution Planning, IFSB

Related Insights

US Agencies Propose Rule on Appraisals for Real Estate Transactions

US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) proposed a rule to increase the threshold level at or below which appraisals would not be required for the residential real estate transactions from USD 250,000 to USD 400,000. Comments will be accepted for 60 days from publication in the Federal Register.

December 07, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: First Update for December 2018

This week one answer was published as part of the Single Rulebook Questions and Answers (Q&A).

December 07, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

FED Updates Reporting Form and Instructions for FR Y-14Q

FED published the updated reporting form FR Y-14Q for Capital Assessment and Stress Testing, along with the associated instructions.

December 06, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

PRA Finalizes Policy on Minor Amendments to Regulatory Reporting

PRA published the policy statement PS30/18, which contains the final policy following a consultation (CP16/18) on certain amendments to regulatory reporting.

December 05, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

GM of BIS Examines Regulatory Implications of Big Tech in Finance

Agustín Carstens, the General Manager (GM) of BIS, during the keynote address at the FT Banking Summit in London, spoke about new challenges and policy implications of big tech in finance.

December 05, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

ACPR Publishes Version 2.8.1 of the CRD IV Taxonomy

ACPR notified that version 2.8.1 of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) IV Data Point Model taxonomy and version 2.1.0 of the Anti-Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (LCB-FT) taxonomy have been made available.

December 04, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

European Council Endorses Package on CRD 5, CRR 2, BRRD 2, and SRMR 2

European Council endorsed the agreement achieved between the presidency and the Parliament on the key measures of a comprehensive legislative package aimed at reducing risks in the banking sector in EU.

December 04, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

BCBS Report Examines Cyber Resilience Practices Across Jurisdictions

BCBS published a report that identifies, describes, and compares the range of observed bank, regulatory, and supervisory cyber-resilience practices across jurisdictions.

December 04, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

EIOPA Publishes Q&A on Regulations and Guidelines

EIOPA published new sets of questions and answers (Q&A) on guidelines, implementing regulations, and delegated regulations applicable to insurers in Europe.

December 03, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

ESMA Registers A.M. Best (EU) Rating Services as Credit Rating Agency

ESMA, the direct supervisor of credit rating agencies (CRAs) in EU, has registered A.M. Best (EU) Rating Services B.V. as a CRA under the CRA Regulation, with effect from December 03, 2018.

December 03, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2316