MNB published a consultation setting out expectations for the management of climate change and environmental risks as well as the implementation of environmental sustainability aspects in the business of a credit institution. The aim of the future guidelines is to increase transparency and predictability, to facilitate the uniform application of relevant legislation, and to improve the awareness and preparedness of the banking sector in relation to these risks. The comment period for this consultation ends on February 16, 2021.
One of the central bank's expectations, as per the draft, is that credit institutions should identify their climate change and environmental risks and be able to make informed strategic and business decisions. The draft recommendation expects the governing bodies of financial institutions with governance powers to clarify their responsibilities in relation to climate change and environmental risks. Basic expectations also include that credit institutions incorporate climate change and environmental risks into the risk management framework in a way that allows for their prudent management and the reduction or downsizing of funding for environmentally unsustainable activities. MNB also considers it a good practice for credit institutions to set targets for the development of their environmentally sustainable lending activities and for the development of lending or funding products that help environmental sustainability. It urges credit institutions to formally become signatories to the UN Responsible Banking Guidelines, thus directly committing themselves to the application of the related framework. The new draft regulation stipulates that financial institutions must publish detailed, informative data on climate change and environmental risks, taking into account the forthcoming rules. It also draws attention to the need for credit institutions to seek to reduce their own ecological footprint and to offset unavoidable (no longer mitigable) greenhouse gas emissions.
Keywords: Europe, Hungary, Banking, Climate Change Risk, ESG, Disclosures, MNB
Previous ArticleCBM Revises Directive on Macro-Prudential Policy in Context of CRD5
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) announced that the Green and Sustainable Finance (GSF) Cross-Agency Steering Group has launched the information and data repositories and outlined the progress made in advancing the development of green and sustainable finance in Hong Kong.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published a report that explores the feasibility of integrating the G-Cubed general equilibrium model into the NGFS suite of models.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.