IMF published its staff report under the 2018 Article IV Consultation with Bolivia. The authorities emphasized that banks remained profitable, non-performing loans (NPLs) are the lowest in the region, credit is flowing to productive sectors, and the credit quotas had helped to diversify the economy and facilitate financial deepening. The IMF directors encouraged the authorities to remove credit quotas and interest rate caps to limit the build-up of vulnerabilities and to ensure that lending decisions better reflect intrinsic risks.
The staff report highlights that the banking sector appears sound, although some indicators have been deteriorating. The overall capital adequacy ratio of the banking system stands at 12.2%, with all banks above the regulatory minimum of 10%. NPLs rose slightly to 1.9% of total loans in June 2018 from 1.7% a year earlier but remain low by international standards due in part to robust credit growth. The share of restructured loans rose to 2.4% in June 2018 and banks’ return on equity fell from 17% in 2016 to 12% in 2018, respectively.
The report notes that the Financial Services Law (FSL) has induced rapid credit growth and may be adversely affecting financial inclusion. The imposition of credit quotas and interest rate ceilings may have hindered the assessment of credit risks. The FSL may be inadvertently hurting financial inclusion, as available data suggest that the number of small loans decreased by 10% between September 2014 and June 2018 while loan amounts increased. International experience suggests that lending caps tend to reduce financial intermediation, lead to less transparency, and raise risks to financial stability, including by hurting the viability of small and medium-size banks. While the banking sector remains broadly stable, updated bank stress test results confirm the following trends that were noted in 2017:
- Credit risk: About one half (most) of banks would need to raise capital to meet regulatory requirements if NPL ratio doubles (quadruples) from the current level. Potential losses would be large for some banks but, in aggregate, the losses would remain manageable (at 0.1% and 0.9% of GDP, respectively).
- Liquidity risk: While liquidity at the system level has improved from a year ago, estimations under an extreme scenario––the largest deposit withdrawal rates observed in recent years happen at all banks simultaneously—suggest that many banks would struggle to cover liquidity needs.
- Exchange rate risk: Direct exchange rate risks are limited, reflecting low dollarization ratios and net foreign asset positions of banks.
The assessment suggests that key provisions of the FSL should be amended. Credit quotas should be relaxed to limit poor-quality credit growth. Interest caps should also be removed so that lending decisions better reflect intrinsic risks. Additionally, the recommendation is that efforts to make the supervisory and regulatory framework more risk-based and forward-looking should continue. The specific measures could include implementing full-fledged stress tests, introducing capital surcharges for operational and market risks, and adopting a review and evaluation process that considers the financial institution’s risk profile, risk mitigating techniques, and capital planning.
Related Link: Staff Report
Keywords: Americas, Bolivia, Banking, Article IV, NPLs, CAR, Financial Stability, Credit Risk, Stress Testing, Liquidity Risk, IMF
Previous ArticleOSFI Updates Guideline on Asset Securitization for Insurers
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.