EBA Response on Reclassification of Grandfathered Own Fund Instruments
EBA published a response to a letter it had received from a law firm (Akin Gump LLP) regarding the case of a reclassification by an institution of some specific grandfathered own funds instruments. EBA also addressed this issue through its Q&A process via the Q&A on Single Rulebook. Q&A 2018_4417 clarifies in more general terms the appropriate prudential treatment for such cases.
In its answer, EBA has concluded that reclassifications of own funds instruments as described—that is, from a grandfathered category to a fully eligible category—although unusual, are not prohibited as such by the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). However, the EBA answer recalls that, as explained in the introductory recitals of the CRR (recitals 78 and 119), the general purpose of the grandfathering provisions as they relate to own funds is to ensure an appropriate continuity in the level of own funds, while also ensuring that institutions have sufficient time to meet the new required levels and definitions of own funds and that certain capital instruments that do not comply with the definition of own funds laid down in the CRR are phased out. To the extent that grandfathering allows for deviations from the new criteria on the quality of own funds instruments, those deviations should be limited to the largest extent possible. The possibility for institutions to benefit from a grandfathered treatment should, therefore, be subject to strict conditions.
In cases where institutions operate such reclassifications, very close scrutiny should be exercised by the competent authority on the reasons for such a reclassification. This is particularly recommended if in contexts where no change in the relevant applicable laws or terms and conditions of the instruments has taken place prior to the reclassification, the reclassification has a significant impact on the capital ratios or any forthcoming changes to the CRR and related new grandfathering provisions in relation to eligibility of own funds are likely to come into force.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Own Funds Requirements, CRR, Single Rulebook, Q&A, EBA
Previous Article
EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Third Update for December 2018Related Articles
|
News
BoE, FCA, and MAS Announce Collaboration on Cyber SecurityMAS and UK financial authorities (BoE and FCA) announced that they will work together to strengthen cyber security in their financial sectors.
June 13, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
CBIRC Advisory Committee Holds Meeting, Discusses Regulatory IssuesThe first meeting of the International Advisory Committee (IAC) of CBIRC was held in Shanghai from June 11 to 12, 2019.
June 13, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
APRA Response to Proposal on Revisions to Capital Framework for BanksAPRA published a paper in response to the first round of consultation on proposed changes to the capital framework for authorized deposit-taking institutions.
June 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
APRA Finalizes Schedule on Scope of Variable Remuneration Under BEARAPRA has released a response letter and the final wording of the schedule in relation to how the Banking Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) applies to variable remuneration arrangements for medium and small authorized deposit-taking institutions (ADIs).
June 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EC Publishes Fourth Progress Report on Reduction of NPLs in EU BanksEC published the fourth progress report on the reduction of non-performing loans (NPLs) in banks in EU.
June 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FASB Adds Taxonomy Entry Points in Relation to 2019 DEI TaxonomyFASB has incorporated additional entry points for the 2019 GAAP [Generally Accepted Accounting Principles] Financial Reporting Taxonomy and the 2019 SEC Reporting Taxonomy, in connection with the issuance of the 2019 Document and Entity Information (DEI) Taxonomy by SEC.
June 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EC Publishes Draft Equivalence Decisions for Credit Rating AgenciesEC is requesting feedback on the draft implementing decisions on recognition of legal and supervisory systems of Hong Kong, Japan, Mexico, and U.S. as equivalent to the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on credit rating agencies.
June 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
BaFin Consults on AFS Recommendation to Increase CCyB for BanksBaFin is requesting feedback on increasing the domestic countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) to 0.25%, with effect from July 01, 2019, pursuant to Article 92(3) of Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
June 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
MAS Revises Capital Adequacy Requirements for Banks in SingaporeMAS issued amendments to the Notice 637 on risk-based capital adequacy requirements for banks incorporated in Singapore.
June 10, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
PRA on Modification by Consent of Definition of Capital Rules in CRR 2PRA announced its decision to offer a modification by consent of the Rules 7.1 and 7.5 of the Definition of Capital Part of the PRA Rulebook.
June 10, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
