EBA is consulting on the draft regulatory technical standards on the criteria to identify all categories of staff whose professional activities have a material impact on the risk profile of institutions (referred to as "risk takers"). The suggested identification process is based on a combination of qualitative and quantitative criteria. The consultation runs until February 19, 2020. After the finalization of the draft regulatory technical standards, these standards are expected to be submitted to EC in June 2020.
These draft standards have been revised in light of Article 94 (2) of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD), as amended by the EU Directive 2019/878 (CRD5) that mandates EBA to develop draft regulatory technical standards to set out the criteria to define managerial responsibility and control functions; material business unit and significant impact on the risk profile of the relevant business unit; other categories of staff not expressly referred to in Article 92(3) CRD. The risk takers will be identified based on the criteria laid down in the revised Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) and those specified within the draft regulatory technical standards. The qualitative criteria that were set out in 2014 in the regulatory technical standards on the identified staff have been largely retained in the updated draft regulatory technical standards. The revised qualitative criteria identify staff with managerial responsibilities and with decision-making powers that have a material impact on the institutions risk profile.
In terms of quantitative criteria, the revised CRD sets out a threshold of total remuneration of EUR 500,000 combined with the average of the remuneration of members of the management body and senior management. The draft regulatory technical standards retain the additional quantitative criteria that identify the staff high levels of remuneration above EUR 750,000 and the 0.3% of staff with the highest remuneration, based on the rebuttable presumption that the professional activities of those members of the staff would have a material impact on the risk profile of institutions.
Members of staff are identified as having a material impact on the risk profile of an institution as soon as they meet at least one of the criteria, be it the criteria foreseen under the CRD, the qualitative or quantitative criteria in the draft regulatory technical standards, or, where necessary because of the specificities of their business model, the additional internal criteria, to ensure that all risk takers are identified.
Comment Due Date: February 19, 2020
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, CRD5, Operational Risk, Remuneration, Regulatory Technical Standards, EBA
Previous ArticleISDA Outlines Work Priorities for 2020
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.