APRA announced that it will remove its supervisory benchmark on interest-only residential mortgage lending by authorized deposit-taking institutions. The benchmark was put in place as a temporary measure in March 2017, as part of a range of actions over recent years to reinforce sound lending practices. The introduction of the benchmark has led to a marked reduction in the proportion of new interest-only lending, which is now significantly below the 30% threshold.
Earlier this year, APRA announced its intention to remove the supervisory benchmark on investor loan growth, subject to the authorized deposit-taking institutions providing certain assurances about the strength of their lending standards. Most authorized deposit-taking institutions have now provided those assurances. The authorized deposit-taking institutions that are no longer subject to the investor loan growth benchmark will also no longer be subject to the benchmark on interest-only lending from January 01, 2019. For other authorized deposit-taking institutions, the supervisory benchmark will be removed concurrently with the removal of the investor loan growth benchmark.
Notwithstanding the removal of the interest-only benchmark, authorized deposit-taking institutions still need to ensure they maintain adequate oversight of the level and type of interest-only lending, consistent with APRA’s Prudential Practice Guide APG 223 Residential Mortgage Lending and ASIC’s responsible lending obligations on borrower requirements and objectives. APRA plans to conduct a review of the authorized deposit-taking institution risk controls on interest-only lending next year, as part of a broader assessment of improvements that have been made in lending standards. Along with the other members of the Council of Financial Regulators, APRA will also continue to closely monitor conditions in the housing market. As with investor loan growth, a re-acceleration in interest-only lending at an industry-wide level would raise systemic concerns. In such a scenario, APRA would consider the need to apply industry-wide measures in response.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Residential Mortgage Lending, APG 223, Supervisory Benchmark, APRA
Previous ArticleEC Publishes Legislative Package in Preparation for Brexit
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.
MAS published the guidelines on individual accountability and conduct at financial institutions.
APRA published final versions of the prudential standard APS 220 on credit quality and the reporting standard ARS 923.2 on repayment deferrals.
SRB published two articles, with one article discussing the framework in place to safeguard financial stability amid crisis and the other article outlining the path to a harmonized and predictable liquidation regime.
FSB hosted a virtual workshop as part of the consultation process for its evaluation of the too-big-to-fail reforms.
ECB updated the list of supervised entities in EU, with the number of significant supervised entities being 115.
OSFI published the key findings of a study on third-party risk management.
FSB is extending the implementation timeline, by one year, for the minimum haircut standards for non-centrally cleared securities financing transactions or SFTs.