EIOPA Report Examines Use and Impact of LTG and Equity Risk Measures
EIOPA submitted—to the European Parliament, European Council, and EC—its 2018 and third annual report on Long-Term Guarantee (LTG) measures and measures on equity risk. The Solvency II Directive requires a review of the LTG measures and the measures on equity risk until January 01, 2021. As part of this review, EIOPA reports annually on the impact of the application of the LTG measures and the measures on equity risk to the European Parliament, European Council, and EC.
The report first provides information on the legal background of the review of the LTG measures and measures on equity risk, describes the data used for this report, and offers a short overview of the European insurance market. It then captures the overall and detailed impact of these measures on financial position of the undertakings, policyholder protection, investments, consumer protection, financial stability, competition, and a level playing field in the insurance market in EU. Finally, the report focuses on risk management aspects in view of the specific requirements for LTG measures, also including an analysis of detailed features and types of guarantees of products with long-term guarantees.
Similar to the analyses of previous years, the results this year show that most of the measures are widely used. Nearly 737 insurance and reinsurance undertakings in 23 countries with a European market share of 74% use at least one of the voluntary measures. The voluntary measures include the matching adjustment, the volatility adjustment, the transitional measures on the risk-free interest rates, the transitional measures on technical provisions (TMTP), and the duration-based equity risk sub-module. The volatility adjustment and the transitional measure on technical provisions are particularly widely used. The volatility adjustment is applied by 696 undertakings in 23 countries to mitigate the effect of exaggerations of bonds spreads. The transitional measure on technical provisions is applied by 162 undertakings in 11 countries with respect to contracts concluded before the start of Solvency II to ensure a smooth transition to the new regime.
The average Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) ratio of undertakings using the voluntary measures is 231% and would drop to 172% if the measures were not applied. This confirms the importance of these measures for the financial position of insurance undertakings. Additionally, EIOPA conducted an analysis on risk management aspects in relation to the regulatory reporting by undertakings of the LTG measures. The analysis covered the following aspects:
- The liquidity plan for undertakings applying the matching or the volatility adjustment
- The assessment of sensitivity of technical provisions regarding the assumptions underlying the extrapolation, the matching adjustment, and the volatility adjustment
- The assessment of compliance with capital requirements, with and without the measures
- Potential measures to restore compliance and analysis of LTG measures in the own risk and solvency assessment
National supervisory authorities identified room for improvement in relation to the level of detail of the regular supervisory reporting. In addition, they performed case studies to further explore how insurers build-in the results of the assessments on asset-liability management (ALM) into their overall ALM and risk management system. Practices observed vary across countries and measures.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Solvency II, Long-term Guarantee, Equity Risk, Matching Adjustment, Volatility Adjustment, TMTP, SCR, EIOPA
Featured Experts
Adam Koursaris
Asset and liability management expert; capable modeler; risk and capital specialist
Cassandra Hannibal
Life insurance actuary; risk management and economic capital specialist
Jerome Ogrodzki
Insurance asset and liabilities modeling specialist; stochastic modeling expert
Related Articles
ECA Recommends Actions to Enhance Resolution Planning for Banks
EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.
BoE Publishes Key Elements of the 2021 Stress Testing for Banks in UK
BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.
PRA Proposes Rules on Identity Verification of Depositor Protection
PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
FSB Publishes Work Program for 2021
FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.
FED Revises Capital Planning and Stress Testing Requirements for Banks
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.
ECB Releases Results of Bank Lending Survey for Fourth Quarter of 2020
ECB published results of the quarterly lending survey conducted on 143 banks in the euro area.
Bundesbank Publishes Derivation Rules for Reporting by Banks
Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.
ESAs Publish Reporting Templates for Financial Conglomerates
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.
EBA Publishes Report on Asset Encumbrance of Banks in EU
EBA published the annual report on asset encumbrance of banks in EU.
FCA Proposes Guidance on Mortgage and Consumer Credit Repossessions
FCA proposed two sets of guidance on the approaches to mortgage repossessions and consumer credit repossessions, with comment period ending on January 18, 2021.
