EIOPA published the results of its 2019 Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provisions (IORPs) stress test. This biennial exercise assesses the resilience and potential vulnerabilities of the European Defined Benefit and Defined Contribution pensions sector, tailored to the specificities of the diverse European pensions sector and its potential impact on financial stability. For the first time, the European stress test exercise covered the analysis of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors for IORPs. EIOPA also published a factsheet, a presentation by the EIOPA Chair Gabriel Bernardino, and the frequently asked questions on the IORP stress test.
Nineteen countries participated in the exercise, covering more than 60% of the national Defined Benefit and 50% of the national Defined Contribution sectors in terms of assets—in most countries. In total 176 IORPs participated, out of which 99 were Defined Benefit IORPs and 77 were Defined Contribution IORPs. The results of the 2019 stress test show that the European Economic Area pensions sector is better funded in the baseline compared to previous exercises. To some extent, this results from the absence of the UK sector from the exercise, which has been facing significant challenges in recent years and which—due to its size—had dominated previous EIOPA pensions stress tests. Yet, the second largest IORP sector in the European Economic Area, the Netherlands, was affected by the relatively high exposure to U.S. equities and the heavy U.S. market volatilities in the baseline at the end of 2018, which subdued in the course of 2019.
In the 2019 exercise, EIOPA employed an extended cash flow analysis, which provided important insights into the stress effects in terms of timing: IORPs' financial situation would be heavily affected in the short term, leading to substantial strains on sponsoring undertakings within a few years after the shock and resulting in potential long-term effects on the retirement income of members and beneficiaries over decades (should the short-term effects become permanent). Assessing the potential conjoint investment behaviors of IORPs after the stress event, EIOPA observed an expected tendency to re-balance to pre-stress investment allocations within 12 months after the shock. That may indicate countercyclical aspects of the expected investment behavior, yet would also come at a risk.
The majority of IORPs in the sample indicated having taken appropriate steps to identify sustainability factors and ESG risks for their investment decisions, which is important for an effective implementation of the IORP 2 Directive; however, only 30% of these IORPs have processes in place to manage ESG risks. Additionally, only 19% of the IORPs in the sample assess the impact of ESG factors on risks and returns of investments. The preparedness of IORPs to integrate sustainability factors is widely dispersed and seems correlated to how advanced the national frameworks were. EIOPA will follow-up on the findings and analyze, in more depth, the investment behavior of IORPs, in particular in the persistently ultra-low and negative interest rate environment. To do so, EIOPA will make use of the significantly improved pensions reporting from 2020. Going forward, EIOPA wants to further improve its analytical tool set for stress testing IORPs, extending the horizontal approach and, with that, assessing the common exposures and vulnerabilities of the Defined Benefit and Defined Contribution sectors together.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Stress Testing, Occupational Pensions, IORPs, ESG, IORP2, Defined Benefit, Defined Contribution, Climate Change Risk, Sustainable Finance, EIOPA
Previous ArticleEIOPA Report Analyzes Use and Impact of Long-Term Guarantee Measures
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.
The European Commission (EC) announced plans to defer the application of 13 regulatory technical standards under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (2019/2088) by six months, from January 01, 2022 to July 01, 2022.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) proposed to amend the supervisory statement on supervision of run-off undertakings that are subject to Solvency II regulation.
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.