The Chairs of ESAs issued a letter in response to the IFRS consultation on sustainability reporting. In the letter, the Chairs agreed that improving data availability and public disclosure by corporates is a key element to foster sustainable growth and strongly support the development of globally accepted non-financial reporting standards to facilitate the disclosure of meaningful and comparable metrics on environmental, social and governance (ESG) aspects. They also support that international standards should build on existing jurisdictional and international initiatives, including those of EU. ESMA also published a detailed response to this consultation on sustainability reporting. In its response, ESMA recommends establishing high-quality international standards while catering to the needs of jurisdictions that are at different stages in their sustainability efforts.
IFRS had issued a consultation paper in September 2020 to better identify stakeholder needs in the area of sustainability reporting and further understand how to address current demands. In their response to the consultation, ESAs support IFRS with the expertise built in the European regulatory and supervisory community in its ambitious and important endeavor to improve sustainability reporting globally. The joint letter highlights that any non-financial reporting standards and underlying methodologies will have to be sufficiently clear to be auditable and enforceable, also emphasizing the following aspects:
- The letter notes the importance of global challenges posed by sustainability for investors and other stakeholders and their call for a common set of standards. ESAs support the IFRS initiative to consider the potential for globally accepted sustainable reporting standards to promote internationally consistent and comparable non-financial reporting. ESAs point out that, to be successful, any future standards should cater to jurisdictions that are at different stages of development in the area of sustainable finance, while ensuring that the best and most advanced available practices are used as a basis for the development of these standards.
- It is important to build on the existing initiatives and to take key notions such as double materiality into account; the aim of this should be to enhance the relevance of disclosures and require reporting on the impact of sustainability risks on business models as well as the impact of businesses on sustainability factors.
- Additional aspects of ESG, beyond climate, need to be addressed.
The ESA letter and ESMA response follow the June 2020 joint response of ESA Chairs to EC in relation to the review of the Non-financial Reporting Directive, also known as NFRD. In the June response, the three ESA Chairs had acknowledged the need for a standardization solution in Europe, while calling for the development of international standards in the medium term. The ESMA response to this consultation notes that, in developing international standards for sustainability reporting, IFRS builds on the available initiatives and leverages on the experience of jurisdictions, such as Europe, where work is already advanced in terms of principles and requirements for non-financial reporting and sustainable finance.
Keywords: International, Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, ESG, Climate Change Risk, Reporting, Double Materiality, Non-Financial Reporting, NFRD, IFRS, ESAs
Dr. Denton provides industry leadership in the quantification of sustainability issues, climate risk, trade credit and emerging lending risks. His deep foundations in market and credit risk provide critical perspectives on how climate/sustainability risks can be measured, communicated and used to drive commercial opportunities, policy, strategy, and compliance. He supports corporate clients and financial institutions in leveraging Moody’s tools and capabilities to improve decision-making and compliance capabilities, with particular focus on the energy, agriculture and physical commodities industries.
Previous ArticleEIOPA Updates Data to Calculate Volatility Adjustments Under SII
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority of Germany (BaFin) proposed to amend the “Capital Investment Conduct And Organization Ordinance” and issued a draft circular on the minimum resolvability requirements for resolution planning.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed guidelines, for the resolution authorities, on the publication of the write-down and conversion and bail-in exchange mechanic, with the comment period ending on September 07, 2022.
The Financial Services Authority of Indonesia (OJK) is strengthening cooperation with the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Japanese Financial Services Agency (JFSA)
The European Parliament and the Council published Regulation 2022/868 on European data governance (Data Governance Act).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published phase 2 of its reporting framework 3.2. The technical package supports the implementation of the updated reporting framework by providing standard specifications