EC adopted a Delegated Regulation that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) regarding the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures. These technical standards specify how institutions should take into account the factors of financial strength, political and legal environment, transaction and/or asset characteristics, strength of the sponsor and developer, and security package when assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures. If neither the European Council nor the Parliament object, the Delegated Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Under the internal ratings-based approach, for specialized lending exposures in respect of which an institution is not able to estimate probabilities of default (PDs) or the institutions' PD estimates do not meet certain requirements, institutions are to assign risk-weights to specialized lending exposures in accordance with Article 153(5) of CRR. Institutions are required to classify each specialized lending exposure in one of the four specified classes: project finance, real estate, object finance, and commodities finance. To ensure a harmonized approach to the assignment of the specialized lending exposures to categories, it should be laid down how those factors are to be taken into account by providing for a calculation of values on the basis of which the factors can be linked to the risk categories. For the institutions to adequately apply each of those factors, they should be further specified in the form of sub-factors with a view to clarifying the assessment criteria for each situation. To adequately assess the sub-factors, it is necessary to further specify some sub-factors in sub-factor components.
To reflect the internationally agreed standards on assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures, as specified by BCBS in the Basel II framework, and to take into account the large number of variations in specialized lending exposures, different assessment criteria should be applied to each class of specialized lending exposures when applying the factors. Before assigning a risk-weight to a specialized lending exposure, institutions should determine to which of those classes the specialized lending exposure most closely corresponds. For specialized lending exposures that are not in default, institutions should apply the assessment criteria associated with the relevant class in the Annex of these technical standards. For specialized lending exposures that are identified as in default, the institution should assign the exposure to category 5.
In addition to this, in exceptional situations, institutions should be allowed not to apply a certain sub-factor or sub-factor component for an individual specialized lending exposure, where they find it not to be relevant. Institutions should also be allowed not to apply a certain sub-factor or sub-factor component to all specialized lending exposures belonging to a type of exposures when that sub-factor or sub-factor component is not a relevant risk driver for that type of specialized lending exposures. Institutions should specify for each type of exposure how the different factors are combined in the final assignment of the specialized lending exposure to one of the categories. The final assignment to a category should be done on the basis of the weighted average of the cardinal numbers of the categories to which the exposure has been assigned, for each factor. The weight that institutions assign to each factor should not be lower than 5% and not be higher than 60%.
Effective Date: OJ+20 Days
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, CRR, Basel, Risk Weight, Lending Exposures, Regulatory Capital, IRB Approach, Credit Risk, EC
Previous ArticleEBA Suggests Further Changes to Standards on IRB Assessment
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.
ECB published results of the quarterly lending survey conducted on 143 banks in the euro area.
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.
EBA published the annual report on asset encumbrance of banks in EU.
MAS revised the guidelines that address technology and cyber risks of financial institutions, in an environment of growing use of cloud technologies, application programming interfaces, and rapid software development.
FED updated the reporting form and instructions for the FR Y-9C report on consolidated financial statements for holding companies.
EBA issued a consultation paper on the guidelines on monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects of the establishment of intermediate EU parent undertakings, or IPUs, as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive.
EC published Regulation 2021/25 that addresses amendments related to the financial reporting consequences of replacement of the existing interest rate benchmarks with alternative reference rates.
BIS published a bulletin, or a note, that examines the cyber threat landscape in the context of the pandemic and discusses policies to reduce risks to financial stability.
HM Treasury, also known as HMT, has updated the table containing the list of the equivalence decisions that came into effect in UK at the end of the transition period of its withdrawal from EU.