PRA Updates the Policy on Approach to Systemic Risk Buffer
PRA published the final Statement of Policy on the PRA approach to the implementation of the systemic risk buffer (SRB), as proposed in the consultation paper CP29/18. As part of this update, PRA also updated the policy statement PS32/18, which is relevant to ring-fenced bodies within the meaning of section 142A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and large building societies that hold more than GBP 25 billion in deposits (where one or more of the account holders is a small business) and shares (excluding deferred shares)—jointly known as the "SRB institutions." The effective date for these changes is December 13, 2018.
In CP29/18, PRA had proposed to do the following:
- Remove the statement that PRA’s approach to reviewing the Statement of Policy every two years is mandated by the SRB regulations
- Replace references to CP25/16 with the corresponding PRA Statement of Policy on its methodologies for setting Pillar 2 capital, following publication of the final policy
- Include references to Supervisory Statement 45/15 titled ‘The UK leverage ratio framework," which was recently updated with respect to the application of an additional leverage ratio buffer (ALRB) rate to SRB institutions
PRA had received no responses to the consultation. Therefore, PRA has made no changes to the draft policy consulted on in the consultation paper. However, PRA changed footnote 11 in the Statement of Policy to update references to the Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1222/2014. The Statement of Policy was also updated to simplify the formatting and aid readability, including sequential numbering of footnotes, the updating of hyperlinks to reflect the location of materials on the BoE website, and to make hyperlinks more easily identifiable. SRB is intended to increase the capacity of the UK domestic systemically important ring-fenced bodies and building societies to absorb stresses, thus increasing their resilience relative to the system and promoting the safety and soundness of the PRA-regulated firms. SRB is a firm-specific buffer that is based on a firm’s worldwide risk-weighted exposures and each firm will be required to ensure that it is met solely with the common equity tier 1 capital.
In line with the recommendations of the Independent Commission on Banking, the UK legislation implementing the SRB Regulations requires the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) to establish a framework for an SRB that applies to large building societies and ring-fenced bodies. The SRB Regulations require PRA to apply that framework from January 01, 2019. FPC published "The Financial Policy Committee’s framework for the systemic risk buffer" (the SRB framework) in May 2016. Alongside the FPC framework, this Statement of Policy will form BoE's broader framework for SRB. PRA will review this Statement of Policy at least every two years.
Related Links
Effective Date: December 13, 2018
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Systemic Risk Buffer, SRB Regulation, Ring Fencing, PS32/18, CRR/CRD, PRA
Previous Article
BDE Publishes Technical Instructions for Reporting by BanksRelated Insights
|
News
OFR Adopts Data Collection Rule on Centrally Cleared Repo TransactionsOFR adopted a final rule to establish a data collection covering centrally cleared funding transactions in the U.S. repurchase agreement (repo) market.
February 20, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FHFA Finalizes Rule on Federal Home Loan Bank Capital RequirementsFHFA published, in Federal Register, the final rule to adopt, as its own, portions of the regulations of the Federal Housing Finance Board pertaining to the capital requirements for the Federal Home Loan Banks.
February 20, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
SRB Publishes Framework for Performing Valuations in ResolutionThe framework provides independent valuers and the general public with an indication of the expectations of SRB on the principles and methodologies for valuation reports, as set out in the legal framework.
February 19, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
US Agencies Extend Consultation Period for the Proposed SA-CCRUS Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) extended the comment period for a proposed rule to update their standards for how firms measure counterparty credit risk posed by derivative contracts.
February 18, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FED Extends Consultation Period for Stress Testing RuleFED has published in the Federal Register a notice proposing amendments to the company run and supervisory stress test rules.
February 15, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Third Update for February 2019EBA published answers to two questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.
February 15, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
SEC Proposes Rule on Risk Mitigation Techniques for Uncleared SBSSEC proposed a rule that would require the application of specific risk-mitigation techniques to portfolios of security-based swaps (SBS) that are not submitted for clearing.
February 15, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FSB Report Examines Financial Stability Implications of FintechFSB published a report that assesses fintech-related market developments and their potential implications for financial stability.
February 14, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
US Agencies Amend Regulatory Capital Rule to Allow Phase-In for CECLUS Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted the final rule to address changes to credit loss accounting under the U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; this includes banking organizations’ implementation of the current expected credit losses (CECL) methodology.
February 14, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FASB Proposes Taxonomy Improvements for the Credit Losses StandardFASB proposed the taxonomy improvements for the proposed Accounting Standards Updates on Targeted Transition Relief for Topic 326 (Financial Instruments—Credit Losses) and Topic 805 (on Business Combinations—Revenue from Contracts with Customers).
February 14, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
