December 11, 2017

The U.S. GAO published a report on the Federal Housing Administration's (FHA) budgetary reviews of the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund (MMI Fund). The report assesses whether MMI Fund needs more budget authority to cover expected future costs and whether independent actuarial reviews provide complementary information on the fund’s finances. The report finds that capital requirements and stress testing practices need strengthening.

Capital requirements and stress testing practices—tools for managing financial risks—for the MMI Fund are not consistent with all elements of the framework GAO developed to help assess these tools in the context of the FHA single-family mortgage insurance programs. FHA uses the actuarial reviews to assess whether the capital ratio of MMI Fund meets the 2% requirement and how fund components would perform under alternative economic scenarios. While the actuarial assessment does not directly determine the need for additional budget authority, it evaluates the fund’s ability to absorb unexpected losses and may prompt changes in FHA policies and insurance premiums. In accordance with the framework, capital assessments and stress tests of FHA are transparent and incorporate a number of relevant risk factors. However, areas of inconsistency include scenario-based requirement; accountability mechanisms; fund-wide stress tests; and stress test objectives.

The report highlights that strengthening the capital requirement and stress testing practices of FHA could help ensure that the MMI Fund is able to withstand economic downturns and that stress test results are as relevant and useful as possible for risk management. Including reverse mortgages in the fund’s capital assessment has advantages and disadvantages. Unlike for stress tests, FHA jointly assesses forward and reverse mortgages to calculate a combined capital ratio. Subjecting the reverse mortgage portfolio to capital assessment has made its financial condition more transparent. However, the portfolio’s sensitivity to changes in economic assumptions makes the combined ratio more unpredictable. Alternative approaches also pose trade-offs. For example, a separate reverse mortgage capital requirement may help ensure the financial transparency of both portfolios; requiring FHA to hold more capital to account for the volatility of the reverse mortgage portfolio could compel FHA to raise insurance premiums or lower borrowing limits.

 

Related Link: Press Release

Keywords: Americas, US, Insurance, Banking, MMI Fund, Capital Requirements, Stress Testing, FHA, GAO

Related Articles
News

EC Amends Regulation Supplementing Solvency II Directive

EC published the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/981 that amends the Regulation (EU) 2015/35, which supplements Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EC) on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of insurance and reinsurance.

June 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

IOSCO Report Examines Application of International Cyber Standards

IOSCO published a final report that examines the application of the three internationally recognized cyber standards and frameworks by IOSCO member jurisdictions.

June 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Launches 2019 Stress Test Exercise for Life and General Insurers

PRA has launched the biennial insurance stress test and is asking the largest regulated life and general insurers to provide information about the impact of a range of stress tests on their business.

June 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Finalizes Reporting Amendments to Pillar 2 Liquidity Framework

PRA published the final Policy Statement PS13/19 on regulatory reporting amendments and clarifications to the Pillar 2 liquidity framework for banks in UK.

June 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FSB Assesses Implementation of Compensation Standards and Principles

FSB published the sixth progress report on the implementation of its principles and standards for sound compensation practices in financial institutions.

June 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

IMF Publishes Reports on 2019 Article IV Consultation with Ireland

IMF published its staff report and selected issues report under the 2019 Article IV consultation with Ireland.

June 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Updates Data on Deposit Guarantee Schemes in EU

EBA published the 2018 data on two key concepts in the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive (DGSD)—namely, available financial means and covered deposits.

June 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

SNB Updates Form for Reporting Solvency Risk of Counterparties

SNB published the survey (Form Release 5.01) and related documentation for reporting solvency risk of counterparties in the interbank sector (ARIS).

June 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

ISDA Studies Variation in Global Implementation of Margin Requirements

ISDA published a paper that highlights the main areas of difference in the implementation of margin requirements for non-cleared derivatives across jurisdictions and makes recommendations on how to resolve these variations.

June 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

US Agencies Finalize Rule to Streamline Reporting for Small Banks

US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule to streamline the regulatory reporting requirements for small institutions.

June 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3265