APRA released an information paper detailing the findings from its review of the implementation of the Banking Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) by three of the largest authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia. The information paper shares entity-specific observations and examples of better practiced identified in the review as part of the APRA strategy to transform governance, risk culture, remuneration, and accountability (GCRA) across all regulated entities. APRA completed the implementation review of the BEAR at Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ANZ), the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA), and the National Australia Bank (NAB) in February 2020. Westpac Banking Corporation, however, was not included due to an ongoing investigation into potential breaches of the Banking Act 1959.
As at February 2020, APRA has considered that CBA had the most developed approach to implement the BEAR, but that all of the authorized deposit-taking institutions had further work to achieve clearer and more transparent accountability practices. All of the authorized deposit-taking institutions have taken actions and made commitments to address the feedback received. This includes actions and commitments to increase support for implementation of the BEAR, to enhance the use of scenario testing to clarify roles and responsibilities, and to further integrate their breach and consequence management framework with their remuneration frameworks. APRA will assess the effectiveness of these actions and outcomes and will continue to monitor progress through its ongoing supervisory activities. The BEAR is a key regulatory lever for APRA to drive action from authorized deposit-taking institutions and accountable persons. Overall, the APRA review found that all three of the large authorized deposit-taking institutions had designed adequate frameworks to implement the BEAR and that this has helped to deliver the following:
- Greater clarity and transparency of individual accountabilities at authorized deposit-taking institutions
- Sharpened challenge by boards on actions taken by accountable persons to meet their obligations
- More targeted engagement between APRA and authorized deposit-taking institutions to deliver prudential outcomes
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, BEAR, GCRA, Governance, Operational Risk, Basel, ANZ, NAB, APRA
Previous ArticleSRB Industry Dialog Covers MREL Policy, Resolution Planning, and SRF
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released an update on the timelines for revisions to the market risk prudential standards and the implications for the broader capital framework.
Three global standard-setters launched a joint consultation that reviews the margining practices during the COVID-19 pandemic and identifies potential areas for further policy work.
The Bank of England (BoE) published the Statistical Notice 2021/09 requiring additional information from firms and software vendors to assist in the onboarding and testing phases for migrating statistical reporting to the BEEDS portal.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final draft regulatory technical standards on gross jump-to-default amounts and on residual risk add-on under the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the final rules on the Investment Firms Prudential Regime (IFPR) to streamline and simplify the prudential requirements for solo-regulated UK firms authorized under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID).
The European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) have delivered to the European Commission (EC) the final report on the draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published an advice to the European Commission (EC) on funding in resolution and insolvency as part of the review of the crisis management and deposit insurance (CMDI) framework.
The Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) released a report in response to the U.S. President's Executive Order on climate-related financial risk.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a paper that examines the business models and the associated risks posed by big technology firms foraying into financial services sector.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) announced the development of an Asian Green Bond Fund, in collaboration with the development financing community, to channel global central bank reserves to green projects in Asia Pacific.