APRA published a response letter on the consultation on adjusted capital requirements for residential mortgages covered by the First Home Loan Deposit Scheme (FHLDS). The scheme aims to improve home ownership by first home buyers through a government guarantee of eligible mortgage loans for up to 15% of the property purchase price. Recognizing the government guarantee as a valuable form of credit risk mitigation, APRA has proposed to reflect this in the capital framework by applying a lower capital requirement to eligible loans. APRA will shortly provide the standardized authorized deposit-taking institutions that have been included on the National Housing Finance and Investment Corporation’s panel of lenders with formal written approval to apply the adjusted capital treatment, as set out in this letter.
In its consultation, APRA had proposed adjusting the residential mortgage capital requirements detailed in the prudential standard APS 112 that addresses capital adequacy in context of the standardized approach to credit risk. The proposed adjustments involved allowing the eligible First Home Loan Deposit Scheme loans to be treated in a comparable manner to mortgages with a loan-to-valuation (LVR) ratio of 80%. This would allow the eligible First Home Loan Deposit Scheme loans to be risk-weighted at 35% under the current capital requirements of APRA. Once the government guarantee ceases to apply to eligible loans, the authorized deposit-taking institutions would revert to applying the relevant risk-weights set out in APS 112.
APRA received 10 submissions in response to its consultation. Respondents were generally supportive of the proposed capital treatment but sought confirmation about whether the same capital treatment would apply to the eligible First Home Loan Deposit Scheme loans under the revised authorized deposit-taking institutions capital framework, which is commencing from January 01, 2022. After considering all feedback, APRA is proceeding with the capital treatment as initially outlined in the consultation letter. APRA considers that this approach is simple to implement, appropriately reflects the value of the government guarantee as a form of credit risk mitigation, and will improve competition for the provision of these mortgages. APRA will apply the same approach under the revised APS 112; however, the risk-weight may differ from the currently applicable 35%, depending on the calibration of the final mortgage risk-weights.
At this time, APRA is not proposing adjustments to the internal ratings-based capital requirements for First Home Loan Deposit Scheme mortgages. It also did not propose changes to regulatory reporting requirements as part of the adjusted capital requirements. For regulatory reporting purposes, banks should report First Home Loan Deposit Scheme mortgages as having an 80% LVR only under Reporting Standard ARS 112.1 (Standardized Credit Risk – On Balance Sheet Assets). For all other regulatory reporting forms, banks must report the First Home Loan Deposit Scheme mortgages according to their actual LVR. Similarly, for setting internal limits on high LVR lending, APRA expects that the First Home Loan Deposit Scheme mortgages would still be included based on their actual LVR. Irrespective of the presence of the government guarantee, banks should still be setting prudent limits on the amount of this type of lending that they will offer, consistent with their risk appetite.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Banking, Capital Adequacy Framework, Credit Risk, Standardized Approach, APS 112, Responses to Consultation, Residential Mortgage, Reporting, ARS 112.1, Basel III, APRA
Previous ArticleAPRA Approves IOOF Bid to Purchase ANZ Superannuation Licensees
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.