The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) is seeking feedback on the proposed recommendations on the use of innovation facilitators in growth and emerging markets. The consultation report covers three types of innovation facilitators—innovation hubs, regulatory sandboxes, and regulatory accelerators—and proposes four recommendations for emerging market member jurisdictions to consider when setting up innovation facilitators. The report also includes a decision tree for regulators to consider when looking at establishing an innovation facilitator and assessing the type of innovation facilitator to set up. The comment period on the consultation report ends on February 06, 2022.
The emergence of fintech not only has the potential to improve outcomes for investors and consumers of financial services but can also help to solve complex regulatory problems, including using regtech and suptech to enhance risk management, compliance, and supervision. However, fintech also creates new challenges for financial regulators. Thus, regulators need to be innovative and review the perimeter of regulation or adapt the existing regulations and supervisory tools as well as develop new ways of cooperation among a wider range of authorities. From this perspective, the IOSCO report, to which the Growth and Emerging Markets Committee (GEMC) contributed, highlights the increasingly important synergy between fintech and securities market regulation and describes the impact fintech has on investors and financial services. It also highlights the possibility that fintech may have a greater impact on emerging markets due to their lack of legacy systems, combined with the potential to bring about greater financial inclusion. The report notes that innovation hubs and regulatory sandboxes may provide regulators with additional market intelligence and can constitute a source for understanding potential risks and their mitigating elements. Also, innovation hubs and regulatory sandboxes provide a channel for the industry and innovators to establish fruitful relationships with regulators, thus facilitating a context for a mutual understanding.
The consultation report found that a regulatory response to financial innovation requires a balanced approach between the potential opportunities of innovation against the risks for investors, the integrity of markets, and the stability of the financial system. The main challenge for the relevant authorities refers to the development of new methods of identifying, monitoring, and addressing the emerging risks in the financial system. Relevant authorities should consider the steps laid out in the decision tree presented in the report (refer to Chapter 5) before setting up any innovation facilitators. In doing so, the relevant authorities should consider their objectives, scope of regulatory options, and available resources as well as the characteristics of the ecosystem in which financial innovation is taking place. The recommendations proposed in the consultation paper cover four areas:
- Considerations prior to the establishment of innovation facilitators
- Definition and disclosure of objectives and functions of innovation facilitators
- Defined eligible entities and the criteria for application
- Mechanisms for cooperation and exchange of information with both local and foreign relevant authorities
Comment Due Date: February 06, 2022
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Fintech, Regtech, Suptech, Innovation Facilitators, Regulatory Sandbox, Innovation Hubs, Regulatory Accelerators, Emerging Markets, IOSCO
Previous ArticleFSB Report Examines Progress in Implementing Resolution Policies
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/25, which supplements the Investment Firms Regulation (IFR or Regulation 2019/2033) with respect to the regulatory technical standards specifying the methods for measuring the K-factors referred to in Article 15 of the IFR.
The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) published a paper that assesses the ways in which platform-based business models can affect financial inclusion, competition, financial stability and consumer protection.
The European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) published the list of identified financial conglomerates for 2021.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) granted license to Barclays Bank PLC and Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank to operate as foreign authorized deposit-taking institutions under the Banking Act 1959.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the Delegated Regulation 2015/35, which supplements Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EC).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published an Opinion on the scale and impact of de-risking in European Union and the steps that competent authorities should take to tackle unwarranted de-risking.
The French Financial Markets Authority (AMF) published its 2022 work priorities, along with the supervisory priorities for 2022.
The U.S. Department of the Treasury issued a determination on a request for an exemption, by RBC US Group Holdings LLC, from certain requirements of the rule implementing the qualified financial contracts (QFC) recordkeeping requirements under the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) announced that publication of 24 LIBOR settings has ended and that, going forward, the 6 most widely used sterling and Japanese yen settings will be published using a changed methodology.
The People’s Bank of China (PBC) formulated the recently issued Fintech Development Plan (2022 to 2025) under the Outline of the 14th Five-Year Plan (2021-2025) for National Economic and Social Development and the Long-Range Objectives through the Year 2035.