FSB Report Examines Progress in Implementing Resolution Policies
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that takes stock of progress in implementing the FSB resolution policies and enhancing resolvability across the banking, financial market infrastructure, and insurance sectors. Overall, the report finds that progress toward resolvability has been significant; however, the recent evaluation of the “too big to fail” reforms found that a number of gaps need to be addressed to fully realize the benefits of the resolution reforms. The report also sets out the priorities of FSB in the resolution area going forward. This year’s report commemorates the tenth anniversary of the FSB Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for Financial Institutions.
In addition to the gaps in the area of "too big to fail," the report finds that digital innovation is giving rise to new challenges for resolution planning, including in relation to the reliance on third-party service providers and cloud services, and to the need to assess resolvability of non-traditional market participants. The report highlights that work is underway to build-up external total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) for four emerging market economy global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) that are due to comply with the TLAC standard by January 2025. All other G-SIBs report that they already meet or exceed the final TLAC requirement. Not all G-SIBs consistently disclose information on internal TLAC. Below are the key highlights of the FSB work priorities for the banking sector:
- Conduct further analysis on issues identified as part of the “road test” carried out by Crisis Management Groups on unallocated TLAC resources and discuss potential further issues relating to form, location, and approach to deployment of unallocated TLAC resources; monitor (external/internal) TLAC issuance on the basis of public disclosures; report on both these activities by end-2022 (as part of the 2022 Resolution Report)
- Discuss and share authorities’ practices on resolution planning for banks other than G-SIBs that could be systemic in failure and consider whether further work should be undertaken to support authorities’ resolution planning; report progress on this by end-2022 (as part of the 2022 Resolution Report)
- Discuss and share authorities’ practices on specific technical and cross-border issues of bail-in, including on cross-border recognition of related resolution actions; report progress by end-2022 (as part of the 2022 Resolution Report), in addition to shortly publishing a practices paper that summarizes the cross-border issues that remain to be addressed, particularly in relation to funding in resolution and bail-in execution.
- With respect to the continuity of access to financial market infrastructure for banks in resolution, support implementation of the FSB Guidance through further engagement with financial market infrastructure service providers and firms on information exchange and communication protocols; report progress on this by end-2022 (as part of the 2022 Resolution Report)
- Consider whether further guidance is needed on public disclosures on resolution planning and resolvability by firms; report findings by end-2022 (as part of the 2022 Resolution Report)
- Conduct eighth Resolvability Assessment Process for G-SIBs and report high-level findings by end-2022 (as part of the 2022 Resolution Report)
- Share members’ practices on home-host coordination and cooperation arrangements, playbooks, and exercises to test these arrangements; report findings by end 2023 (as part of the 2023 Resolution Report)
- Investigate further obstacles for example, legal, regulatory, and operational) to cross-border funding in resolution, including in regard to the ability to mobilize collateral across borders; report findings by end-2023 (as part of the 2023 Resolution Report)
- Share experiences and lessons learned and explore potential challenges on post-resolution issues, including legal and operational ones; report findings by end-2023 (as part of the 2023 Resolution Report)
In the insurance sector, progress on resolution reforms and resolution planning implementation has been mixed. As in prior years, some jurisdictions have identified systemically important insurers and/or internationally active insurance groups. Work on resolution planning and resolvability assessments for these institutions has started or is underway. FSB will soon publish two papers that present practices regarding financial and operational interconnectedness in resolution planning and funding in resolution.
Related Links
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, FMI, Resolution Framework, Crisis Management Framework, Resolution Planning, Resolvability Assessment, Too-Big-To-Fail, TLAC, Regulatory Capital, Basel, G-SIBs, Systemic Risk, Financial Stability, Work Priorities, FSB
Featured Experts

María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer

Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.

Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Previous Article
EIOPA Sets Out Work Priorities on Proportionality and Green FinanceRelated Articles
EBA Clarifies Use of COVID-19-Impacted Data for IRB Credit Risk Models
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
EP Reaches Agreement on Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
PRA Consults on Model Risk Management Principles for Banks
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
EC Regulation Amends Standards for Calculating Credit Risk Adjustments
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
BIS Hub Updates Work Program for 2022, Announces New Projects
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
EIOPA Issues Cyber Underwriting Proposal, Statement on Open Insurance
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
US Senate Members Seek Details on SEC Proposed Climate Disclosure Rule
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
EIOPA Consults on Review of Securitization Framework in Solvency II
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
UK Authorities Issue Regulatory and Reporting Updates for Banks
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
BCBS Issues Climate Risk Principles while HKMA Expresses Its Support
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.