APRA has announced a review of securitization practices of authorized deposit-taking institutions. This is because APRA has recently identified that some authorized deposit-taking institutions repurchased residential mortgage loans that were subject to repayment deferral from their securitizations. APRA believes that this represents implicit support, which is inconsistent with APS 120, the prudential standard on securitization. APRA has required the institutions that it considers to have provided implicit support to publicly disclose their repurchases as part of upcoming Pillar 3 reporting requirements. Other issues have also been identified in relation to the compliance with APS 120 within these institutions.
APRA believes it is necessary to conduct a program of securitization thematic reviews, which will continue into 2021. Depending on the findings, the reviews may be expanded further. Identification of noncompliance with APS 120 may result in the authorized deposit-taking institution being required to publicly disclose its noncompliance and/or a requirement to hold additional regulatory capital. Additional consequences for non-compliance with APS 120 may also include the need for engagement of an APRA-approved independent third-party to review the authorized deposit-taking institution’s compliance with the prudential standard and for the APRA pre-approval of further securitization issuance. In advance of these APRA reviews, APRA recommends authorized deposit-taking institutions to ensure that they comply with this letter and the intent of APS 120 and to ensure that controls and procedures are in place to maintain compliance. This applies to the documentation and ongoing management of the securitization. Deficiencies identified by APRA as part of its thematic reviews include:
- Little or no procedures or controls to challenge or provide oversight of ongoing securitization operations, such as approving repurchases
- Requirements for authorized deposit-taking institutions to repurchase loans from their securitizations under certain circumstances, in breach of APS 120 paragraph 18
- Considering capitalizing interest to be a further advance and insufficiently considering the provision of implicit support and the guidance in Prudential Practice Guide APG 120 on securitization for the purposes of APS 120, Attachment A, paragraph 6.
Self-identification and timely reporting by authorized deposit-taking institutions to APRA of non-compliance will be favorably considered by APRA when determining the appropriate actions. APS 120 requires authorized deposit-taking institutions to be clearly separate from their securitizations and to permanently transfer credit risk to the securitization investors. APS 120 only allows authorized deposit-taking institutions to repurchase mortgages from their securitizations under limited circumstances and if the borrower is in good standing. The intent of APS 120 is that mortgages are not repurchased by authorized deposit-taking institutions if the borrower is in hardship or the loan is of lower quality, as this would undermine the principle of a clear transfer of credit risk that is at the heart of the regulatory treatment of securitization.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Securitization, Residential Mortgage Loans, Credit Loans, Credit Risk, Regulatory Capital, Securitization Framework, APS 120, Thematic Review, Pillar 3, Disclosures, APG 120, APRA
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) announced that the Green and Sustainable Finance (GSF) Cross-Agency Steering Group has launched the information and data repositories and outlined the progress made in advancing the development of green and sustainable finance in Hong Kong.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published a report that explores the feasibility of integrating the G-Cubed general equilibrium model into the NGFS suite of models.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.