RBNZ Releases Final Decisions Related to Capital Review for Banks
RBNZ released a paper that sets out its final decisions following the comprehensive review of its capital framework for banks, known as the Capital Review. The expected impact of the decisions under the Capital Review is outlined in the Regulatory Impact Assessment accompanying the paper. The key decisions, which start to take effect from July 01, 2020, involve increase in the total capital from a minimum of 10.5% to 18.0% for the four large banks (ANZ, ASB, BNZ, and Westpac) and 16% for the remaining smaller banks. The average level of capital currently held by banks is 14.1%. RBNZ also published a go-to-guide and questions and answers (Q&As) related to the capital review.
The following key decisions have been taken:
- The minimum capital ratio would be significantly increased, to improve the resilience of New Zealand’s banking system
- What is acceptable as the "middle tier" of capital would be expanded to provide banks with greater flexibility
- The lowest tier of capital would remain in the framework
- The large four banks could not have capital lower than 85% of what they would have if they used the RBNZ models to measure capital
Relative to the initial proposals of RBNZ, the final decisions also include:
- More flexibility for banks on the use of specific capital instruments
- A more cost-effective mix of funding options for banks
- A lesser increase in capital for the smaller banks consistent with their more limited impact on society should they fail
- A more level capital regime for all banks—with the four large banks having to measure the risks of their exposures (lending) more conservatively, more in line with the smaller banks
- More transparency in capital reporting
The adjustments to the original proposals reflect the analysis and industry feedback over the past two years. All of these changes will be phased in over a seven-year period, rather than over five years as originally proposed, to reduce the economic impact of these changes. During the course of the Capital Review, RBNZ had released four consultation papers. The first consultation asked what topics should be considered as part of the Review and also set out six high-level principles for the Review. The second consultation asked what should be eligible as bank capital while the third one asked how to measure a bank’s assets. The fourth and last consultation proposed that the minimum capital ratio be increased significantly. The extensive consultation process over 2.5 years has involved a submissions process that attracted more than 200 responses, many meetings with the public and industry groups, and an independent international review by three industry experts.
Related Links
- Press Release
- Capital Review, Decisions 2019 (PDF)
- Regulatory Impact Assessment (PDF)
- Capital Review Go-to-Guide (PDF)
- Q&As (PDF)
Effective Date: July 01, 2020
Keywords: Asia Pacific, New Zealand, Banking, Capital Adequacy Framework, Capital Review, Basel III, Q&A, Regulatory Capital, RBNZ
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Related Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
