ESMA launched a consultation on the guidelines on internal controls for credit rating agencies (CRAs). The guidelines set out the systems and controls that CRAs should have in place to meet the requirements of the CRA Regulation on internal controls. The consultation closes on March 16, 2020. ESMA will consider the responses it receives to this consultation paper in the first quarter of 2020 and expects to publish a final report by the third quarter of 2020.
The CRA Regulation includes a number of requirements for the internal control system that a CRA must have in place to prevent or mitigate any possible conflicts of interest that may impact the independence of its credit rating activities. The proposed guidelines set out the views of ESMA on the components and characteristics that CRAs should have in place to demonstrate the presence of an effective framework for internal controls and effective internal control functions. The Internal Controls Framework focuses on the control environment, risk management, control activities, information and communications, and monitoring activities of a CRA. However, the Internal Controls Functions focus on specific roles, namely compliance, review, risk management, information security, and internal audit. These guidelines have been developed with a view to accommodate the proportionality that is provided for smaller CRAs under the CRA Regulation. The need for guidance on internal controls was identified during the supervisory work of ESMA in 2017 and 2018 and its development was highlighted as part of its 2019 Supervisory Work Program.
Comment Due Date: March 16, 2020
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, CRAs, Internal Control Functions, Guideline, CRA Regulation, ESMA
Previous ArticlePRA Publishes Final Policy on Maintenance of TMTP Under Solvency II
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Commission (EC) announced plans to defer the application of 13 regulatory technical standards under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (2019/2088) by six months, from January 01, 2022 to July 01, 2022.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) proposed to amend the supervisory statement on supervision of run-off undertakings that are subject to Solvency II regulation.
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.